2001
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2001.113575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of treatment delay on long-term left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction successfully treated with primary angioplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19,22,23) If the duration of ischaemia does not exceed 4 hours, further significant improvement may be expected even within 6 months. 20) Our final check-up at 6 months from randomisation showed improved EF outcomes in groups B and C. This improvement was statistically significant in group B patients only. WMSI changes were at the limit of statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19,22,23) If the duration of ischaemia does not exceed 4 hours, further significant improvement may be expected even within 6 months. 20) Our final check-up at 6 months from randomisation showed improved EF outcomes in groups B and C. This improvement was statistically significant in group B patients only. WMSI changes were at the limit of statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…19) Prior studies have established an unequivocal relationship between the duration of ischaemia and the extent of myocardial injury. 19,20) The relationship between ischaemia duration and left ventricular function, however, remains ambiguous. Some data suggest that a shorter duration of ischaemia results in less compromise of left ventricular function in the following days and weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although reperfusion beyond 6 h can not save myocardium, it prevented the ventricular remodeling by prompting the healing of infarcted myocardium. Therefore, the cardiac systolic and diastolic function and wall movement and volume in group A are obviously better than in group D. When delayed PCI was performed, which missed the best chance to open infarct related artery, the infarction area will be bigger and there will be more severe ischemic injury at the edge, which contributed to the development of infarction enlargement [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a significant proportion of patients with STEMI presents to hospitals without PCI capability requiring transfer to PCI‐capable hospitals. Depending on travel distances, availability of transport, and weather conditions, transfer for primary PCI may cause significant delays in obtaining myocardial reperfusion, which can limit the benefit of primary PCI over FT in high‐risk cases . In comparison to patients presenting directly to a PCI‐capable center, those who require inter‐hospital transfer to a PCI‐capable hospital have significantly longer total door‐to‐balloon times (D2B).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%