2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-009-9271-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of time and method of alfalfa stand termination on yield, seed quality, N uptake, soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions under different N fertility regimes

Abstract: A field experiment was conducted in a 7-year old alfalfa stand to compare the influence of time and method of terminating alfalfa stands on crop yield, seed quality, N uptake and recovery of applied N for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and canola (Brassica napus L.), soil properties (ammonium-N, nitrate-N, bulk density, total and light fraction organic C and N), and N 2 O emissions on a Gray Luvisol (Typic Cryoboralf) loam near Star City, Saskatchewan, Canada. The treatments were a 3 9 3 9 4 factorial combinatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend was also observed in the bulk density of four treatments, with those of G, SBC, and SBCG significantly lower than that of CK ( p < 0.05) by 9.1%, 5.6% and 14.7%, respectively. The lower levels of specific gravity and bulk density in treated soils (G, SBC, and SBCG) suggested that sludge biochar application and alfalfa revegetation both significantly reduced soil compaction and enhanced soil porosity and ventilation, which are attributed to the porous structure of the sludge biochar [ 18 ] and the strong root system of alfalfa [ 48 , 49 ]. Total porosity only showed significant differences between CK and SBCG ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar trend was also observed in the bulk density of four treatments, with those of G, SBC, and SBCG significantly lower than that of CK ( p < 0.05) by 9.1%, 5.6% and 14.7%, respectively. The lower levels of specific gravity and bulk density in treated soils (G, SBC, and SBCG) suggested that sludge biochar application and alfalfa revegetation both significantly reduced soil compaction and enhanced soil porosity and ventilation, which are attributed to the porous structure of the sludge biochar [ 18 ] and the strong root system of alfalfa [ 48 , 49 ]. Total porosity only showed significant differences between CK and SBCG ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have demonstrated that the use of biochar can significantly increase soil organic C [ 64 , 65 ], mineral nutrient content (e.g., N, P, K) [ 66 ] and the cation exchange capacity of soil [ 18 ] for its carbon-rich and porous structure [ 56 ] and huge specific surface area [ 67 ]. Increasing quantities of data have shown that alfalfa revegetation can significantly increase soil soil organic carbon and total nitrogen concentrations present in the root ball [ 68 ], C/N ratio [ 57 ], porosity, aeration conditions, and water-holding capacity [ 49 ], all of which could accelerate the mineralization of organic carbon and the release of mineral nutrients from sludge biochar, and in turn promote the alfalfa growth. In the present study, an additive effect on soil chemical properties, like that of soil physical properties, was also detected when combined sludge biochar amendment and alfalfa revegetation ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may not be the case for dry soils in semi-arid climates, however, as Malhi et al (2010) found very low N 2 O emissions (ranging from 0.16 to 0.62 kg N 2 O ha…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To mitigate these negative effects, growers have been moving to conservation tillage practices such as no‐till and strip‐till. These systems leave more plant residue on the soil surface, preserve soil structure, decrease the potential for erosion (Moyer, Clapperton, & Boswall, 2003), improve soil moisture, decrease nitrate (NO 3 − ) leaching, and decrease nitrous oxide greenhouse emissions (Malhi, Lemke, & Schoenau, 2009). However, compared with conventional tillage systems, no‐till systems can have greater compaction (Vyn & Raimbult, 1993), reduced corn emergence rates (Al‐Darby & Lowery, 1987; Licht & Al‐Kaisi, 2005), and lower corn yield (Aflakpui, Vyn, Hall, Anderson, & Swanton, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%