2005
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2005.847659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of tilted geometries on critical current in superconducting thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, such a measurement technique appears to differ from the transport measurements of J c ͑H , , ͒, because the angle between the current direction and the dc field rotation plane is indefinite. However, taking into account that J c ͑H , ͒ dependences for = 0 and 90°are quite similar to each other and they may differ only a bit quantitatively, 14 the J c ͑H , ͒ dependences obtained by the inductive technique are expected to describe correctly the principal features of the dependence of J c , in particular those connected with parallel vortice penetration into a thin film.…”
Section: B Measurement Techniques Of the Critical Current Densitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, such a measurement technique appears to differ from the transport measurements of J c ͑H , , ͒, because the angle between the current direction and the dc field rotation plane is indefinite. However, taking into account that J c ͑H , ͒ dependences for = 0 and 90°are quite similar to each other and they may differ only a bit quantitatively, 14 the J c ͑H , ͒ dependences obtained by the inductive technique are expected to describe correctly the principal features of the dependence of J c , in particular those connected with parallel vortice penetration into a thin film.…”
Section: B Measurement Techniques Of the Critical Current Densitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…represents the GL anisotropy and γ m = (m c /m ab ) ½ the electronic mass anisotropy [18].The scaling works best for higher fields, firstly because at low fields the applied field and the flux lines are not necessarily parallel to each other [19] (a prerequisite for anisotropic GL scaling), secondly because the J c range is larger, leading therefore to a higher accuracy of the scaling. The scaling procedure can provide information about different pinning regimes if γ m is known [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The maximum critical current of the REBCO conductor does not appear at due to the tilted -axis [2], [3]. In the present study, the effect of the tilted -axis was not considered.…”
Section: Development Of Layer-wound Rebco Coilmentioning
confidence: 85%