2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of three plant species with different morphologies on water runoff and soil loss in a dry-warm river valley, SW China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the related factors and runoff generation processes were quite complex and difficult to quantify. For example, studies have confirmed that vegetation cover is a key factor influencing runoff generation (Cantón et al, 2011), but how the source and sink of runoff transfers with plant morphology and its spatial location remains unclear (Xu et al, 2008), particularly when experiencing stochastic rainfall pulses. No sufficient information was provided for selecting suitable plant species in terms of plant morphology and spatial distribution for runoff reduction and vegetation restoration in water-limited environments (de Baets et al, 2007;Xu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the related factors and runoff generation processes were quite complex and difficult to quantify. For example, studies have confirmed that vegetation cover is a key factor influencing runoff generation (Cantón et al, 2011), but how the source and sink of runoff transfers with plant morphology and its spatial location remains unclear (Xu et al, 2008), particularly when experiencing stochastic rainfall pulses. No sufficient information was provided for selecting suitable plant species in terms of plant morphology and spatial distribution for runoff reduction and vegetation restoration in water-limited environments (de Baets et al, 2007;Xu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the physical structures of vegetation, coverage has the effect of reflecting critical stages of ecosystem development and functionality, so it is often taken as an important indicator of restoration success (Vallauri et al 2005;Moreno-de las Heras et al 2009). Some researchers (Bochet et al 1998;Martinez-Mena et al 1999;Sanchez et al 2002;Xu et al 2008) have documented that increasing vegetation cover is an important measure to control water erosion and to improve soil quality. Vegetation type also has been shown to alter soil quality and hydrological characteristics, including increasing soil organic matter and improving soil structure (Thompson et al 2005), which can increase soil infiltration capacity (Ks), water retention, and decrease soil erodibility (Gutierrez et al 1995;Bochet et al 1999;Xu et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Runoff and Soil Loss Measurements. The runoff collection system was designed by Xu et al (2008). Each runoff collection system was enclosed with PVC material (40 × 40 cm [16 × 16 in]), including a sediment collector and a runoff collector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the experimental plots were enclosed with PVC material (500 × 500 mm [1.9 × 1. (Xu et al 2008;Shi et al 2013), and inserted into the soil at about 100 mm (3.9 in) in depth. The plots were kept more than 20 m (0.78 in) away from each other to avoid interference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%