2020
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.1078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of three-dimensionality on propulsive flapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2008, 2009). Although three-dimensional effects compromise the coherence of these structures (Zurman-Nasution, Ganapathisubramani & Weymouth 2020), the formation and subsequent deflection of the dipole maintains its quasi-two-dimensional nature (Couder & Basdevant 1986; Godoy-Diana et al. 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2008, 2009). Although three-dimensional effects compromise the coherence of these structures (Zurman-Nasution, Ganapathisubramani & Weymouth 2020), the formation and subsequent deflection of the dipole maintains its quasi-two-dimensional nature (Couder & Basdevant 1986; Godoy-Diana et al. 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the tip distance to the maximum spanwise domain is 3.2 C . The grid convergence study provided in (20) using an infinite foil with a span length of 6 C in Re = 5300 as a comparison of time-averaged thrust co-efficient for different resolutions. The force coefficient converges to within 7% of the finer simulations (for 2D and 3D simulation) using a resolution of C /Δ x = 128.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most analytical studies using lifting-line theory indicate sweep is advantageous, increasing the thrust and propulsive efficiency (16)(17)(18). While such methodologies are effective at determining lift characteristics on steady wings, they cannot model unsteady rotational three-dimensional flow, including the evolution of vortices that form at the fin's leading edge and tip which lead to the high forces observed in flapping foil propulsion (19,20). While some experimental studies have measured a small flap- ping propulsive benefit to sweep, the effect is smaller than the analytic studies and other experiments have found no impact at all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f is the cycle frequency of flapping and a and θ 0 are the amplitudes of heave and pitch at each section. The term θ bias = 10 • is a pitch bias angle used to ensure non-zero average mean lift as in Zurman-Nasution et al [17] and the phase difference is set to ψ = 90 • to maximize performance [33]. In order to isolate the amplitude (which varies section by section) from the frequency, these motions are characterized as…”
Section: Ii1 Geometry and Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, even on an infinite wing with no tip effect or mean spanwise flow, 3D evolution of the vortex wake limits strip theory applications. Zurman-Nasution et al [17] showed there is only exist a narrow band of kinematics, for instance at Strouhal number ≈ 0.15 − 0.45 for heaving-pitching motion, where the wake remains two-dimensional and 2D force predictions are accurate. In this 2D range, the motion of the foil stabilize the spanwise-perturbed 3D structures found in the separated wake of a stationary foil, but 3D structures reappear when the amplitude of motion increases the shed vortex circulation above a 2D viscous stability limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%