2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the strain on the formation of GaInAs/GaAs quantum structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of the second activation energy in very limited number of cases suggests that the QDs are generally uniform (which is also evidenced by a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of sample surface [1,9]) and the range of values for this energy (below 4 meV) shows that in the case of the existence of a trapping potential its localization energy is extremely low and can usually be neglected for determining the emission properties even at low temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The occurrence of the second activation energy in very limited number of cases suggests that the QDs are generally uniform (which is also evidenced by a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of sample surface [1,9]) and the range of values for this energy (below 4 meV) shows that in the case of the existence of a trapping potential its localization energy is extremely low and can usually be neglected for determining the emission properties even at low temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The growth is driven by self-organization and results in quantum dots ensemble with certain size and shape distribution on InGaAs wetting layer (the Stranski-Krastanov growth mode). Low strain regime which is an effect of small (883) lattice mismatch of approximately 2% between adjacent layers (quantum dots and substrate) and a low indium content (down to 30%) enable growth of structures elongated in one of the lateral directions - [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] [1]. The nominal thickness of deposited InGaAs equals 4.5 nm (wetting layer and quantum dots) and causes relatively small QD surface density of about 5 × 10 9 cm −2 which is advantageous for single dot spectroscopy.…”
Section: Investigated Structures and Experimental Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The typical dimensions of these nanostructures are: (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) nm in width, (20-50) nm in length, and (5-7) nm in the vertical direction (including wetting layer). The increase in the lateral size in the strain-based Stranski-Krastanow growth mode was possible due to lowering the strain via decreasing the amount of indium in the InGaAs alloy compound [26]. This has been proven to be a very effective method of enhancing the oscillator strength of QD transitions, leading to the observation of the strong coupling in the single X-single photon regime in QD-micropillar cavities [1].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a)]. Therefore, we are limited to QDs with a spectral separation below 1 meV from the CM and are thus probing only a very small subset of the whole QD ensemble which shows an inhomogeneous broadening of 62 meV [26]. As a consequence the investigated QDs are similar in both their vertical size and their In content, which are the crucial factors determining the emission energy.…”
Section: Experimental Methodology: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%