2007
DOI: 10.1021/la701231d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Solution pH in the 6-Mercaptopurine Self-Assembled Monolayer (6MP-SAM) on a Au(111) Single-Crystal Electrode

Abstract: Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) have been prepared on a Au(111) single-crystal electrode by immersion of the metal surface in a 100 microM 6MP and 0.01 M HClO4 solution. The 6MP-SAM Au(111) single-crystal electrodes were transferred to the cell and allowed to equilibrate with the different aqueous working solutions before the electrochemical experiments. The influence of the solution pH was studied by cyclic voltammetry, double layer capacitance curves, and electrochemical impedance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blank voltammograms recorded for clean Au(111) in the same electrolyte are also included as a reference (dotted lines in Figure ). For 6MP, a sharp reductive desorption peak can be found at −0.68 ± 0.01 V (vs SCE), as previously reported. , The peak charge is 56 ± 4 μC cm −2 , which corresponds to a surface coverage θ = 0.25 ± 0.02, in good agreement with that obtained from XPS measurements. As is well known, HT yields a desorption peak at −1.07 ± 0.03 V and a charge of 75 ± 7 μC cm −2 , in accordance with θ = 0.33.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Blank voltammograms recorded for clean Au(111) in the same electrolyte are also included as a reference (dotted lines in Figure ). For 6MP, a sharp reductive desorption peak can be found at −0.68 ± 0.01 V (vs SCE), as previously reported. , The peak charge is 56 ± 4 μC cm −2 , which corresponds to a surface coverage θ = 0.25 ± 0.02, in good agreement with that obtained from XPS measurements. As is well known, HT yields a desorption peak at −1.07 ± 0.03 V and a charge of 75 ± 7 μC cm −2 , in accordance with θ = 0.33.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, it is also important to know the stability of the purified DNA–AuNP hybrid. While desorption of thiol compounds has been extensively studied in the context of electrochemistry and SAMs, ,, few reports can be found on the dissociation of DNA from nanoparticles . In this work, we systematically studied the kinetics of DNA dissociation as a function of ionic strength, temperature, pH, and organic solvent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that the more negatively charged the SAM interface is, the greater surface potential difference between the outer plane of closest approach (OHP) and the bulk solution, Φ 1 . Under these conditions, the negatively charged redox probes are prevented from approaching the surface due to electrostatic repulsion, which in turns causes the depletion of the Fe­(CN) 6 3‑/4‑ surface concentration at the OHP zone in the electrical double layer. Then, in the presence of double layer effects, R CT can be expressed as , where z is the charge of the redox probe, β = 1 – α, with α the electron transfer coefficient, and R CT 0 is the charge transfer resistance value for Φ 1 = 0 (i.e., uncharged monolayer). Similarly, the interfacial capacitance in the double layer, C , should be influenced by the dielectric properties of the SAM and its acid–base surface properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%