The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the site of origin on the outcome of squamous cell carcinoma of the maxilla—oral versus sinus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bobinskas et al investigated in 2014 the influence of the site of origin on the outcome of SCC of the maxilla-oral versus sinus. 12 They found that maxillary sinus origin was associated with a poorer prognosis on univariate analysis, but this was not confirmed as an independent risk factor by multivariate analysis. Based on their results, they concluded that maxillary sinus origin is not a risk factor for a poorer prognosis itself, rather it is that these tumors are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis and, due to the complex anatomy of the midface, are more likely to be incompletely resected.…”
Section: Kermer Et Al Reported 36 Patients With Primary Resectablementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bobinskas et al investigated in 2014 the influence of the site of origin on the outcome of SCC of the maxilla-oral versus sinus. 12 They found that maxillary sinus origin was associated with a poorer prognosis on univariate analysis, but this was not confirmed as an independent risk factor by multivariate analysis. Based on their results, they concluded that maxillary sinus origin is not a risk factor for a poorer prognosis itself, rather it is that these tumors are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis and, due to the complex anatomy of the midface, are more likely to be incompletely resected.…”
Section: Kermer Et Al Reported 36 Patients With Primary Resectablementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, most patients present with advanced stage disease and have extensive involvement of adjacent sites at the time of diagnosis. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The tumor sites are usually in close proximity to the orbit, skull base, and the central nervous system, which present particular management difficulties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Skull base metastases are more common and have an incidence of 18 per 100,000 per year. 6 The skull base can be invaded by malignancies originating from the sinonasal tract (esthesioneuroblastoma), 7 the nasopharynx (squamous cell carcinoma), 8 the oropharynx, the ear region, and the orbit (meningioma, osteoma, rhabdomyosarcoma). 5 …”
Section: General Classifications and Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive clinical N stage diagnosed based on the presence of cervical lymph node metastasis from clinical findings pre-surgery for SCC of the sinonasal tract leads to reduced rates of OS, and the rate of patients with SCC of the sinonasal tract and positive clinical N stage ranges from 3.3% to 36.7% [8][9][10][11]. Similarly, having positive surgical margins diagnosed by pathological findings following surgery for SCC of the sinonasal tract also leads to reduced rates of OS [2,5,[12][13][14][15][16] and the rate of positive surgical margins in patients with SCC of the sinonasal tract ranges from 10.5% to 63.5% [14][15][16][17]. Of note, among patients with SCC of the sinonasal tract, the 5-year OS rate among those with positive surgical margins (0% -32.8%) was significantly shorter than among those with negative surgical margins (65.7% -81.8%) [13,15,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%