2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.02.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the roughness on the exchange bias effect of NiFe/FeMn/NiFe trilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result and the other hysteresis loops related to samples e 2 and e 5 have been presented and discussed with more details in ref. [20]. Fig.…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result and the other hysteresis loops related to samples e 2 and e 5 have been presented and discussed with more details in ref. [20]. Fig.…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 displays an asymmetrical loop with two regions related to the seed (region 1) and pinned (region 2) layers. The resulting H ex and H C values are, respectively, (29 AE 1) and (6 AE 1) Oe for the seed layer and (62 AE 1) and (20 AE 1) Oe for the pinned layer [20]. The exchange interfacial energy per unit of area (A FM/AF ) for the bottom and top NiFe/FeMn interfaces was calculated using the expression A FM/AF = J FM/AF / a 2 = H ex t FM M FM from the theoretical model described by Meiklejohn and Bean [3][4][5] for perfect interfaces.…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major portion of publications shows that exchange bias shift decreases when roughness increases [1][2][3][4], though no significant correlations between H EB and roughness was found in some of the works [5,6]. An opposite effect, that is H EB increasing when roughness increased, was also demonstrated in other investigations, [1,3,7], for instance, in monocrystalline silicone AF (with compensated and uncompensated surface), covered with an F-layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, due to the wide variety of materials and deposition techniques used, the dependence of the EB field (H ex ) on the roughness is still controversial. For several systems, the H ex seems to be relatively insensitive to the roughness value [7,11], while in others the H ex varies in direct proportion to the roughness [9,10] or indicates an opposite variation [8]. Research has also shown that the relationship between the H ex and the roughness value is totally different for differently prepared samples [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%