2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7322(03)00064-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the repulsive force potential exponent on viscous and elastic properties of Lennard-Jones fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…53 To circumvent these relatively weak results in a very dense phase, keeping a spherical approximation, a different choice in the way to describe the repulsive part of the potential, with a different repulsive exponent or an exponential description, may be a valuable alternative. [54][55][56] But, more simply, a fit of the molecular parameters using the viscosity database will certainly improve results compared to a purely predictive scheme. Such work to construct a viscosity-optimized database of molecular parameters is in progress.…”
Section: Numerical Results For Real Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…53 To circumvent these relatively weak results in a very dense phase, keeping a spherical approximation, a different choice in the way to describe the repulsive part of the potential, with a different repulsive exponent or an exponential description, may be a valuable alternative. [54][55][56] But, more simply, a fit of the molecular parameters using the viscosity database will certainly improve results compared to a purely predictive scheme. Such work to construct a viscosity-optimized database of molecular parameters is in progress.…”
Section: Numerical Results For Real Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the large deviations at very high pressure on quasi-spherical molecules (see methane or argon, Figures and , respectively), it is probably due to the simple repulsive form of the LJ potential, which is not accurate enough in extreme pressure cases . To circumvent these relatively weak results in a very dense phase, keeping a spherical approximation, a different choice in the way to describe the repulsive part of the potential, with a different repulsive exponent or an exponential description, may be a valuable alternative. But, more simply, a fit of the molecular parameters using the viscosity database will certainly improve results compared to a purely predictive scheme. Such work to construct a viscosity-optimized database of molecular parameters is in progress.…”
Section: Numerical Results For Real Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the effective two parameter Lennard-Jones ͑LJ͒ 12-6 potential is the most widely used model for exploring the behavior of simple fluids ͑i.e., molecules for which the most important intermolecular forces are repulsion and van der Waals disper-sion͒ in statistical physics and related scientific domains. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Apart from their direct use in molecular simulations, simple effective potentials can be used as the elementary bricks of modern molecular-based equation of state ͑EOS͒. However, from a theoretical point of view, it is well known that the LJ potential is not a true representation of even two-body interactions between argon atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IPL approximation emphasizes the dominant role of the short-range repulsive interactions for local properties such as structural relaxation. Various groups have explored through numerical simulations the relationship of the steepness of the repulsive potential to properties such as the equation of state, longitudinal wave transmission, vibrational spectrum, liquid and gaseous transport, the correlation between fluctuations of energy and pressure, and the fragility. , Recently, two simulations have appeared in which eq 1 was used to superpose dynamical data for polymer chains described using an LJ m −6 potential with m = 12 and an added term for the intrachain interactions. The results appear contradictory: Tsolou et al obtained a scaling exponent of γ = 2.8 for the segmental relaxation times of simulated 1,4-polybutadiene, while Budzien et al superposed diffusion coefficients for prototypical polymer chains using γ = 6 when attractions were included in the simulation and γ = 12 when they were omitted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%