1990
DOI: 10.1021/ic00347a026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the polyamino carboxylate chelating ligand (L) on the kinetics and mechanism of the formation of FeII(L)NO in the system FeII(L)/NO/HONO/NO2- in aqueous solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both oxidants, the oxidation of Fe(II)DTPA was an order of magnitude slower than that of Fe(II)EDTA, despite the similar nature of these ligands, which is consistent with previous results (Graf et al, 1984). The absence of a readily-exchangeable bound water molecule in the Fe(II)DTPA complex (Zang and Van Eldik, 1990a) could explain the much slower oxidation kinetics observed for this complex if oxidation of Fe(II)L (L = EDTA, DTPA) by O 2 and H 2 O 2 was an inner sphere process; in this case, with the initial binding of the oxidant to Fe(II)L being the rate-limiting step, exchange of a bound H 2 O molecule for an oxidant molecule should presumably proceed at a much greater rate and with less steric hindrance than would be observed when oxidant binding first requires breaking of an Fe(II)-chelate bond (Graf et al, 1984). Summers et al (2008) have demonstrated the importance of the water-loss rate to the related superoxide-mediated reduction of Fe(III)EDTA and Fe(III)DTPA.…”
Section: Verified As Discussed In Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both oxidants, the oxidation of Fe(II)DTPA was an order of magnitude slower than that of Fe(II)EDTA, despite the similar nature of these ligands, which is consistent with previous results (Graf et al, 1984). The absence of a readily-exchangeable bound water molecule in the Fe(II)DTPA complex (Zang and Van Eldik, 1990a) could explain the much slower oxidation kinetics observed for this complex if oxidation of Fe(II)L (L = EDTA, DTPA) by O 2 and H 2 O 2 was an inner sphere process; in this case, with the initial binding of the oxidant to Fe(II)L being the rate-limiting step, exchange of a bound H 2 O molecule for an oxidant molecule should presumably proceed at a much greater rate and with less steric hindrance than would be observed when oxidant binding first requires breaking of an Fe(II)-chelate bond (Graf et al, 1984). Summers et al (2008) have demonstrated the importance of the water-loss rate to the related superoxide-mediated reduction of Fe(III)EDTA and Fe(III)DTPA.…”
Section: Verified As Discussed In Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 1, respectively, with the latter being favored at low and room temperature. When no additional nucleophile is present, two mononuclear complexes (2) fold together to form the dinuclear complex (1). In order to bind the nucleophile, the bridge unfolds and allows a relatively open access to the active site.…”
Section: Kinetic Studies Of the Binding Of No To [Fe(s 4 Net 2 N)] Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to bind the nucleophile, the bridge unfolds and allows a relatively open access to the active site. Evidence for the dinuclear species in solution comes from its very low solubility as well as the mass spectrum which shows a molecular ion peak at m/z = 1024 that corresponds to the dinuclear species (1). NO binding to the dinuclear complex [Fe II (S 4 NNEt 2 )] 2 was kinetically investigated and occurs according to the overall reaction (1).…”
Section: Kinetic Studies Of the Binding Of No To [Fe(s 4 Net 2 N)] Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations