2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the packaging atmosphere and presence of co-contaminants on the growth of photobacteria on chicken meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite previous reports supporting the reduced growth of photobacteria under modified atmospheres in packaged raw meat (Hauschild et al, 2021 ), it is still a common niche from which these species are isolated (Fuertes-Perez et al, 2019 ) in high cell numbers of >10 8 log CFU/g. While we deliberately chose to study specific strains alone in vitro in this study without any interference or bias by a consortium or variations of substrates, differences in observed growth might be due to the presence of other species of meat spoilers or differences in the model used for growth compared to naturally contaminated raw meat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite previous reports supporting the reduced growth of photobacteria under modified atmospheres in packaged raw meat (Hauschild et al, 2021 ), it is still a common niche from which these species are isolated (Fuertes-Perez et al, 2019 ) in high cell numbers of >10 8 log CFU/g. While we deliberately chose to study specific strains alone in vitro in this study without any interference or bias by a consortium or variations of substrates, differences in observed growth might be due to the presence of other species of meat spoilers or differences in the model used for growth compared to naturally contaminated raw meat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While we deliberately chose to study specific strains alone in vitro in this study without any interference or bias by a consortium or variations of substrates, differences in observed growth might be due to the presence of other species of meat spoilers or differences in the model used for growth compared to naturally contaminated raw meat. Spoilage species can have an influence by consumption of O 2 and by reduction of part of the stress induced, as in is the case of B. thermosphacta (Kolbeck et al, 2019 ), or commensal relationships with photobacteria (Hauschild et al, 2021 ; Hauschild, 2022 ). Additionally, the model used in this study, due to the limitations in proteomic sample collection, requires planktonic growth with constant shaking reducing the formation of protective strategies, such as biofilms, that modify diffusion of gases to the cells (Flemming, 1993 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to choose a material that preserves the properties of the packaged product and ensures the safety of its ingestion. Meat products facilitate the development and proliferation of microorganisms due to the high content of water activity and nutrient availability [ 4 , 5 ]. According to studies, the main reason for the proliferation of sporulation and the reduction of the shelf life is the choice of inappropriate packaging material or improper packaging conditions [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%