2016 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chengdu) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/phm.2016.7819756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the number of acoustic emission descriptors on the accuracy of destructive process identification in concrete structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In statistical methods available for structural identification, the optimised selection of AE parameters is critical, i.e., only the parameters that have low mutual correlation should be chosen. The collection of diagnostic variables should be capable of a full-scale characterisation of the most important aspects of the phenomenon under analysis [5].…”
Section: Ae Signals Database [5-8]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In statistical methods available for structural identification, the optimised selection of AE parameters is critical, i.e., only the parameters that have low mutual correlation should be chosen. The collection of diagnostic variables should be capable of a full-scale characterisation of the most important aspects of the phenomenon under analysis [5].…”
Section: Ae Signals Database [5-8]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests aimed at finding predominant destructive processes that might occur during testing of reinforced concrete structures under operation. The database was verified on real facilities [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Acoustic Emission Evaluation Of Gas Pipelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leading research centers worldwide have devoted a great deal of attention to the development of methods for assessing the condition of structural elements and preventing their failure. As a result, many methods for evaluation of component durability [1,2,3,4,5] are currently in wide use. These methods are based on aversion to change assuming prior knowledge of the element microstructure, load history, and in-service conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our opinion, the solution to the problems of diagnosing engineering structures is the use of continuous, long-term monitoring using the passive NDT methods. One of them is the acoustic emission (AE) method [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%