“…In the present study, for conciseness, the fatigue behavior of the CTS steel specimen is analyzed for the cases of Φ ¼ 30 and Φ ¼ 60 only. In particular, according to Ma et al, 65 The predictions of the proposed method are compared with experimental and numerical results provided by Ma et al 65 and also with numeric previsions achieved by Sajith et al 24,66 and Cheng et al 67 Concerning numerical results, it is worth noting that Ma et al 65 and Sajith et al 24,66 have used standard FEbased numerical models, which update the computational mesh of the numerical model for each increment of the crack length during the propagation process. In particular, for the case of Φ ¼ 30 , Sajith et al 24 report that the crack propagation process has been conducted by extending the crack through incremental steps of size Δa ¼ 0:5 mm starting from the initial crack length of 45 mm to the final length of 65 mm.…”