2011
DOI: 10.1504/ijewm.2011.037363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the nature of hydrodynamic constraints on aerobic biofilms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, studies with fluidic devices have advanced our knowledge on the effect of flow on biofilm architecture (Coyte et al, 2017;Paul et al, 2012;Talvy et al, 2011;Wheeler et al, 2019;Yawata et al, 2016) and allowed to introduce a distinction between conventional biofilm (B) and streamers (S) (Ghosh et al, 2021;Scheidweiler et al, 2019;Stoodley et al, 1998;Taherzadeh et al, 2012). Streamers are structures consisting in a base attached to the support substratum and a tail elongated in the flow direction (Taherzadeh et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, studies with fluidic devices have advanced our knowledge on the effect of flow on biofilm architecture (Coyte et al, 2017;Paul et al, 2012;Talvy et al, 2011;Wheeler et al, 2019;Yawata et al, 2016) and allowed to introduce a distinction between conventional biofilm (B) and streamers (S) (Ghosh et al, 2021;Scheidweiler et al, 2019;Stoodley et al, 1998;Taherzadeh et al, 2012). Streamers are structures consisting in a base attached to the support substratum and a tail elongated in the flow direction (Taherzadeh et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%