2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1566-1369(00)80028-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the morphology on the impact fracture behaviour of iPP/EPR blends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The broken samples displayed in Figure 13 show the SEM measured radius, r p , of plastic zone as a function of β‐phase content. A slight enlargement of the plastic zone size can be observed as the β‐phase content increases for both filled and unfilled samples, in agreement with previous findings from dart23 or CT impact testing 24. However, quite novel data have been found regarding the specific energy dissipated in the plastic zone that significantly increase in parallel to the β‐phase content for unfilled samples, as shown in Figure 14.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The broken samples displayed in Figure 13 show the SEM measured radius, r p , of plastic zone as a function of β‐phase content. A slight enlargement of the plastic zone size can be observed as the β‐phase content increases for both filled and unfilled samples, in agreement with previous findings from dart23 or CT impact testing 24. However, quite novel data have been found regarding the specific energy dissipated in the plastic zone that significantly increase in parallel to the β‐phase content for unfilled samples, as shown in Figure 14.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Irrespective of the actual role of the β → α phase change in PP toughening, there is plenty of evidence that β PP is much more craze prone than α PP 22–24, 28, 40. Cavitation generally originates from negative hydrostatic stresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its potential as a macroscopic toughness indicator has already been mentioned in several studies. Quantitative or at least qualitative relationships between the strengths of the principal or secondary relaxations and the fracture resistances have been found, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] although the small strain, linear viscoelastic measurements in DMA differ fundamentally to the large strain, nonlinear behavior observed under impact conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%