2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4635-0_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Mechanical Properties of Lime Mortar on the Strength of Brick Masonry

Abstract: Abstract. This paper aims at improving the quality of lime mortar masonry by understanding the mechanics of mortars and masonry and their interaction. It investigates how the mortar's compressive and flexural strengths impact the compressive and bond strength of clay brick masonry bound with calcium lime (CL) and natural hydraulic lime (NHL) mortars. It concludes that the strength of the bond has a greater impact on the compressive strength of masonry than the mortar's strength. The masonry compressive strengt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean bond strengths of all NHL masonry tested were within the range 0.07-0.33 MPa. This is lower than the range 0.2-0.61 MPa reported by Pavia and Hanley [6] utilising a richer 1:2.5 mix ratio (by mass) but within that of 0.05-0.63 MPa reported by Zhou et al [5] utilising a longer curing duration (91 days); it also lies within the 0.11-0.16 MPa range reported by Costigan and Pavia [7] utilising the same curing duration. An additional possible reason for the greater strength results found in previous studies [5,6] is their use of perforated bricks allowing mortar to flow in and bond to the perforation sides which may have led to overestimated bond strengths due to a greater bond area than that assumed.…”
Section: Flexural Bond Strengthcontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Mean bond strengths of all NHL masonry tested were within the range 0.07-0.33 MPa. This is lower than the range 0.2-0.61 MPa reported by Pavia and Hanley [6] utilising a richer 1:2.5 mix ratio (by mass) but within that of 0.05-0.63 MPa reported by Zhou et al [5] utilising a longer curing duration (91 days); it also lies within the 0.11-0.16 MPa range reported by Costigan and Pavia [7] utilising the same curing duration. An additional possible reason for the greater strength results found in previous studies [5,6] is their use of perforated bricks allowing mortar to flow in and bond to the perforation sides which may have led to overestimated bond strengths due to a greater bond area than that assumed.…”
Section: Flexural Bond Strengthcontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The results of these tests indicate values that could be achieved in practice as the specimens were subjected to realistic site curing conditions over a 28-day period and using realistic mix proportions, albeit sheltered from rain. Previous studies on NHL mortars [7] have found substantial increases in bond strength between 28-days and 6-months therefore the values presented may thus represent less than half the expected long-term bond strength. The work presented in this paper has shown, however, that it is still practical to use 28-day data despite NHL mortars slow strength gain.…”
Section: Flexural Bond Strengthmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the strength comparison was the ultimate result, the mode of failure of the unreinforced lime mortar may be of interest. Costigan and Pavia [41] investigated the failure modes of lime mortar specimens. It was found that plastic deformation behaviour occurs with a lower-strength natural hydraulic lime mortar by itself (strengths of less than 2 MPa), while higher-strength mortars deform elastically to a brittle failure [41].…”
Section: Brick-to-mortar Bond Test In Shearmentioning
confidence: 99%