Nano Online 2016
DOI: 10.1515/nano.11671_2015.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the local structure in phase-change materials on their dielectric permittivity

Abstract: Ge-Sb-Te alloys, which belong to the phase-change materials, are promising materials for data storage and display and data visualization applications due to their unique properties. This includes a remarkable difference of their electrical and optical properties in the amorphous and crystalline state. Pronounced change of optical properties for Ge-Sb-Te alloys is linked to the different bonding types and different atomic arrangements in amorphous and crystalline states. The dielectric function of phase-change … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the profile of ε 2 is shown in Fig. 4 can be attributed to different local atomic arrangement in the amorphous and crystalline states of PCM [16]; larger coordination number, longer bond length and larger coefficient of thermal expansion explain softening the phonon modes in the crystalline states of PCM [17]. These two phenomena provide evidence that the bonding type in the crystalline state of PCM is not the same as that inherent to the amorphous state, i.e., covalent bonding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The difference in the profile of ε 2 is shown in Fig. 4 can be attributed to different local atomic arrangement in the amorphous and crystalline states of PCM [16]; larger coordination number, longer bond length and larger coefficient of thermal expansion explain softening the phonon modes in the crystalline states of PCM [17]. These two phenomena provide evidence that the bonding type in the crystalline state of PCM is not the same as that inherent to the amorphous state, i.e., covalent bonding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%