2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the load application rate and the statistical model for brittle failure on the bending strength of extruded ceramic tiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e higher the value of m, the more reliable is the results of the mechanical properties [32] (Figure 8). e correlation factors, R 2 , presented in Table 2, were higher than 0.800, which can be considered as satisfactory [33]. e in vitro bio lm formed on the mandible was reduced when compared to the biomass bio lm formed on commercial bone grafts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…e higher the value of m, the more reliable is the results of the mechanical properties [32] (Figure 8). e correlation factors, R 2 , presented in Table 2, were higher than 0.800, which can be considered as satisfactory [33]. e in vitro bio lm formed on the mandible was reduced when compared to the biomass bio lm formed on commercial bone grafts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The lower sintering temperature, G1, G4 and G8 showed very low Weibull modulus, justifying the incomplete sintering of the specimens, which results in lower homogeneity of the specimens, with open pores in most of the specimens, which generates the lower specimen density. All the R² correlation factors were close to or above 0.9, and according to Defez et al, who use 0.75 as the lowest acceptable value of the correlation factor for Weibull's analysis [22], it was considered acceptable, all factors of all groups of studies. Figure 6 shows the comparative and qualitative analysis of the correlation factor for all groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Slight differences may be attributed to an increase (or decrease) in the brittle characteristic of the material, which is reflected in the surface roughness of the fracture surface. 19 Rough fracture surfaces generally have larger m values than flat fracture surfaces, such as X-cut, Z-cut, and (44°,180°)-cut samples as shown in Figures 7 and 8.…”
Section: Bending Strength Results and Samplementioning
confidence: 89%
“…The size distribution of inevitable defects in the material is believed to be a contributing factor toward the scatter of failure strength . In previous reports, when other brittle materials such as silicon, glass, ceramics, and so forth were tested on fracture mechanics, a large variability in measured strengths was also observed. The variability of the fracture stress was reduced in some studies by the introduction of pre-cracks in samples .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%