2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68103-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Insulation Defects Size on the Value of the Wire Capacitance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regularities of the distribution of the electrostatic field in insulating materials were considered in [5][6][7][8][9][10]. When covering the topic in [5], it would be worthwhile to reveal other shapes of defects, for example, with an ellipsoidal cross section, as well as to investigate the effect on the detection of dielectric breakdown of the inhomogeneity of the location of pores.…”
Section: Analysis Of Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The regularities of the distribution of the electrostatic field in insulating materials were considered in [5][6][7][8][9][10]. When covering the topic in [5], it would be worthwhile to reveal other shapes of defects, for example, with an ellipsoidal cross section, as well as to investigate the effect on the detection of dielectric breakdown of the inhomogeneity of the location of pores.…”
Section: Analysis Of Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the shortcomings of this work include the failure to take into account air defects in the model, which are replaced by water coming from the environment. In [7], when studying the effect of defects on the linear capacity of the insulation, the compensatory effect of defects of different nature is not taken into account, for example, a combination of local thinning and an internal defect with a lower dielectric permittivity than in the insulating material. With this effect, the linear capacity may not change much, although the concentration of the electric field will be significantly different from the average.…”
Section: Analysis Of Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%