2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the effective stress coefficient and sorption-induced strain on the evolution of coal permeability: Model development and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the diffusion coefficient was assumed to be constant, which is not consistent with other studies (Bird et al 1960;Lama and Nguyen 1987;Kranz et al 1990). Moreover, although the importance of the effect of desorption time on CBM extraction has been widely investigated, many researchers have not taken the geomechanical process into consideration (Reeves and Pekot 2001;Shi and Durucan 2004;Palmer 2009), or have primarily assumed the absolute permeability to be a constant during both gas/water production and dry-gas production (Clarkson et al 2007;Ziarani et al 2011), as a consequence of which they missed an important phenomenon of coalbed reservoirs (Cui and Bustin 2005;Gu and Chalaturnyk 2005;Chen et al 2009Chen et al , 2012Connell 2009;Liu and Rutqvist 2010;Wang et al 2011Wang et al , 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the diffusion coefficient was assumed to be constant, which is not consistent with other studies (Bird et al 1960;Lama and Nguyen 1987;Kranz et al 1990). Moreover, although the importance of the effect of desorption time on CBM extraction has been widely investigated, many researchers have not taken the geomechanical process into consideration (Reeves and Pekot 2001;Shi and Durucan 2004;Palmer 2009), or have primarily assumed the absolute permeability to be a constant during both gas/water production and dry-gas production (Clarkson et al 2007;Ziarani et al 2011), as a consequence of which they missed an important phenomenon of coalbed reservoirs (Cui and Bustin 2005;Gu and Chalaturnyk 2005;Chen et al 2009Chen et al , 2012Connell 2009;Liu and Rutqvist 2010;Wang et al 2011Wang et al , 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious that the increases in ScCO 2 injection pressure will reduce the effective pressure of the coal seam. The permeability of deep coal seam increases with the effective pressure decrease . Therefore, the deep coal seam with low permeability is one of the geological media to potentially store huge amounts of ScCO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pini et al (2009) reported that gas species-dependent coefficient for swelling was required to match their permeability data for CO 2 (0.62) and N 2 (2.4); however they contributed this difference mainly to the potential weakening impact of CO 2 on the coal sample (reduced Young's Modulus). Chen et al (2012) used a partition ratio that varies linearly with the cleat porosity to match the permeability of CH 4 /CO 2 for three different coals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to the fact that, unlike under uniaxial strain conditions, only a portion of the free matrix swelling strain (as opposed to matrix shrinkage strain in CBM production) contributes to the cleat permeability changes measured in the laboratory under a constant confining pressure. Several studies have shown that an improved/good match to the laboratory data for CH 4 and CO 2 can indeed be obtained by using a correction factor (or a partition ratio) to the free swelling strain in the field permeability models (Robertson and Christiansen, 2007;Pini et al, 2009;Liu and Rutqvist, 2010;Connell et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2012). However, the previous studies tend to focus on matching the permeability data for individual tests, and a more holistic view of how swelling strain affects the cleat permeability/porosity of a core under a fixed confining pressure is still largely lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%