1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1987.tb11242.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the dopamine receptor agonists fenoldopam and quinpirole in the rat superior mesenteric vascular bed

Abstract: 1 The effect of local administration of the dopamine2 (DA2)-receptor agonist quinpirole and of the DA,-receptor agonist fenoldopam was studied in the in situ, constant flow autoperfused, superior mesenteric vascular bed of the rat.2 Local infusion of quinpirole (30 pg kg-'min-' for 5min) had no effect on baseline perfusion pressure; it reduced the pressor responses to electrical stimulation (4 Hz, 1 ms, supramaximal voltage) of the periarterial sympathetic nerves to 45.6 ± 2.1% of its original value but did no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because we did not measure regional blood flow, it remains unclear if this was caused by an increase in total gastric perfusion or by an intramural redistribution of blood flow toward the gastric mucosa (31). The effects of fenoldopam were abolished by DA 1 -receptor blockade, implying that other vasodilatory mechanisms [e.g., ␣ 1 -antagonism as described for fenoldopam (12)(13)(14)] are negligible. Because DA 1 -receptors are more densely allocated in vessels of the gastrointestinal mucosa compared with vessels of the other layers (31), we speculate that this might facilitate the redistribution of blood flow toward the mucosa.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, because we did not measure regional blood flow, it remains unclear if this was caused by an increase in total gastric perfusion or by an intramural redistribution of blood flow toward the gastric mucosa (31). The effects of fenoldopam were abolished by DA 1 -receptor blockade, implying that other vasodilatory mechanisms [e.g., ␣ 1 -antagonism as described for fenoldopam (12)(13)(14)] are negligible. Because DA 1 -receptors are more densely allocated in vessels of the gastrointestinal mucosa compared with vessels of the other layers (31), we speculate that this might facilitate the redistribution of blood flow toward the mucosa.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Stimulation of ␣ 1 -adrenoceptors in the splanchnic region causes mesenteric vasoconstriction (9) counteracting the desired, dopamine receptorinduced mesenteric vasodilation. Whereas dopamine may stimulate ␣ 1 -receptors even at low doses (10,11), fenoldopam acts antagonistically on those receptors (12)(13)(14) and may thus provide another vasodilatory pathway. We therefore hypothesized that fenoldopam is superior to dopamine in increasing gastric mucosal oxygenation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, we speculated that combining dopamine with a selective ␣ 1 -receptor antagonist unmasks the beneficial effects of DA 1 -stimulation on gastrointestinal mucosal oxygenation. In contrast, fenoldopam acts antagonistically on ␣ 1 -receptors (22)(23)(24) and may thus provide another vasodilatory pathway. We therefore hypothesized that dopamine under ␣ 1 -blockade and fenoldopam are superior to dopamine alone in increasing gastric mucosal oxygenation.…”
Section: In Cirrhotic Patients]mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, the greater fall in office BP in patients with severely elevated pretreatment BP is caused to a large extent by the reduction of the white coat effect. Because 24-hour ABP is void of white coat and placebo effect, the changes in ABP are smaller and the pretreatment BP level lower, [13][14][15] thereby explaining at least in part why changes in office BP and ABP are not related to each other in a 1:1 fashion. The statistical phenomenon of regression to mean might be also one contributing factor, but it is impossible to quantify the effect size from our data set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%