2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.72.014602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Dirac sea on proton electromagnetic knockout

Abstract: We use the relativistic distorted-wave impulse approximation (RDWIA) to study the effects of negative-energy components of Dirac wave functions on the left-right asymmetry for (e, e ′ p) reactions on 16 O with 0.2 ≤ Q 2 ≤ 0.8 and 12 C with 0.6 ≤ Q 2 ≤ 1.8 (GeV/c) 2 . Spinor distortion is more important for the bound state than for the ejectile and the net effect decreases with Q 2 . Spinor distortion breaks Gordon equivalence and the data favor the CC2 operator with intermediate coupling to the sea. The left-r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…shells of 12 C(ν µ , µp) and 12 C(ν µ , µn) reactions are shown in Fig. 5 as functions of positive p m values together with Saclay [51], SLAC [42], and JLab [41] data. The data for beam energies The averaged reduced cross sections for the removal of nucleons from the 1p shell in 16 O(ν µ , µp) and 16 O(ν µ , µn) reactions are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…shells of 12 C(ν µ , µp) and 12 C(ν µ , µn) reactions are shown in Fig. 5 as functions of positive p m values together with Saclay [51], SLAC [42], and JLab [41] data. The data for beam energies The averaged reduced cross sections for the removal of nucleons from the 1p shell in 16 O(ν µ , µp) and 16 O(ν µ , µn) reactions are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, σ red depends upon initial electron energy due to Coulomb distortion. The RDWIA approach with LEA code was successfully tested against measured 12 C(e, e ′ p) [42], 16 O(e, e ′ p) [43], and 40 Ca(e, e ′ p) [12] differential and reduced cross sections, and the normalization factors S(α)…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation