Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the co-firing on the leaching of trace pollutants from coal fly ash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous studies, some elements such as Ca, Cr and Mg are reported to the surface of the fly ash particles, while Al, Si, K, Pb and many other trace elements are distributed throughout the particle [40,41]. Most of the cationic elements including Mg, Cu, Mn and Ni, show lower leaching rates due to their chemical behavior in solution below pH 10.…”
Section: Results Of the Toxicity Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to previous studies, some elements such as Ca, Cr and Mg are reported to the surface of the fly ash particles, while Al, Si, K, Pb and many other trace elements are distributed throughout the particle [40,41]. Most of the cationic elements including Mg, Cu, Mn and Ni, show lower leaching rates due to their chemical behavior in solution below pH 10.…”
Section: Results Of the Toxicity Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In environmental conditions, reduced S species are generally present in negligible quantities and SO 4 2-is the dominant species (Fruchter et al, 1990). Iwashita et al (2005) and Izquierdo et al (2008) noted that the leached concentrations of S in water are correlated to its concentration in fly ash. With water only, 40-80% of SO 4 2-was removed from alkaline fly ash from Australia, the Netherlands and Spain, whereas up to 90% was removed from acidic fly ash (Nugteren et al, 2001;Querol et al, 2001;Ward et al, 2003).…”
Section: Sulphurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been carried out on ashes from coals co-fired with petroleum coke, sewage sludge, and different types of biomass (e.g. Izquierdo et al, 2007Izquierdo et al, , 2008Hower et al 2005b;Jia et al 2002;Steenari and Lindqvist 1999;Diaz-Somoano et al, 2006;Wolski et al 2004;Lapa et al 2007), but little attention has been paid to the effects of co-firing with oil during start-up, even though this process may also have a significant impact on fly ash characteristics (Navarrette et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%