2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12600-013-0338-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the carpophagous generations of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana on grape bunch rots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In north-eastern Italy, the moth usually completes three generations per year, of which the first is anthophagous and the other two are carpophagous [ 3 ]. Damage is mostly associated with the second and third generations, which cause yield losses and favor the spread of bunch rots [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In north-eastern Italy, the moth usually completes three generations per year, of which the first is anthophagous and the other two are carpophagous [ 3 ]. Damage is mostly associated with the second and third generations, which cause yield losses and favor the spread of bunch rots [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…botrana is a multivoltine species with a facultative diapause (physiological state of inactivity). The number of generations depends on latitude, photoperiod, humidity, temperature, climate, microclimate and food type [11]. In Europe, two generations per year are common in Germany, Switzerland, Austria and northern France, while three generations (and sometimes four) have been reported in southern France, Spain, Portugal, Greece and Italy [12,13].…”
Section: Life Cycle Of L Botrana On Grapevinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the larvae of Lobesia botrana can disseminate viable conidia of B. cinerea within vineyards (Fermaud and Le Menn, 1989;Pavan et al, 2014). Therefore, the recent detection of L. botrana in Chile poses an important epidemiological risk for GM development.…”
Section: Survival Inoculum Sources and Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%