2015
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the bracket on bonding and physical behavior of orthodontic resin cements

Abstract: The aim of the study is to determine the influence of the type of bracket, on bond strength, microhardness and conversion degree (CD) of four resin orthodontic cements. Micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) test between the bracket base and the cement was carried out on glass-hour-shaped specimens (n=20). Vickers Hardness Number (VHN) and micro-Raman spectra were recorded in situ under the bracket base. Weibull distribution, ANOVA and non-parametric test were applied for data analysis (p<0.05). The highest values… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the effects of varying RE on DC and VHN values of OC layer was influenced by the bracket type. These results are in agreement with previous findings, 20,21 and demonstrated that the use of metallic brackets require longer exposure periods due to the detrimental effects of light attenuation caused by the presence of those brackets interposed between the OC layer and LCU tip. 27 As a consequence, it is possible that lower radiant emittance values were delivered at the corners in comparison to those reaching the middle of the OC layer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the current study, the effects of varying RE on DC and VHN values of OC layer was influenced by the bracket type. These results are in agreement with previous findings, 20,21 and demonstrated that the use of metallic brackets require longer exposure periods due to the detrimental effects of light attenuation caused by the presence of those brackets interposed between the OC layer and LCU tip. 27 As a consequence, it is possible that lower radiant emittance values were delivered at the corners in comparison to those reaching the middle of the OC layer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The concept of an ideal debonding consists of failure at the support/ adhesive interface, and the remained adhesive on the enamel surface to be carefully removed using suitable tools, in order to allow a minimum or no loss of enamel [9,10]. Cement debris at enamel level can favor plaque adherence, producing demineralized areas and cavities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bracket type used, as well as the way the orthodontic forces are applied , influence the bond strength and the tensions that appear in the bonding layer and in the enamel [9,10]. Also, the enviromental factors such as soft drinks accelerate the damage of the enamel surface [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the ceramic bracket sought to simulate the clinical procedure of cementation, where the orthodontic composite is polymerized thorough the interposition of a bracket. Although the ceramic appliance allows a better light passing in comparison with metal and plastic bracket 33 , the interposition of this device still promotes loss of irradiance due to the absorption and scattering of the light coming from the photoactivator, influencing the amount of light received by the composite resin beneath it, and, consequently, on its physical-mechanical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%