2016
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/49/7/072004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the boundary conditions on the natural frequencies of a Francis turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mode shapes of all kinds of Francis turbine runners are similar, especially those with a similar specific speed value, since they have common geometrical characteristics [ 5 , 19 , 20 ]. These mode shapes are formed by different number of nodal diameters (ND) with different relative amplitude between the crown, band and blades [ 8 , 21 ]. If the deformation in the crown is bigger than in the band or in the blades, these mode shapes are called crown-dominant mode shapes (CD) [ 9 ].…”
Section: Dynamics Of a Francis Turbine Runnermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mode shapes of all kinds of Francis turbine runners are similar, especially those with a similar specific speed value, since they have common geometrical characteristics [ 5 , 19 , 20 ]. These mode shapes are formed by different number of nodal diameters (ND) with different relative amplitude between the crown, band and blades [ 8 , 21 ]. If the deformation in the crown is bigger than in the band or in the blades, these mode shapes are called crown-dominant mode shapes (CD) [ 9 ].…”
Section: Dynamics Of a Francis Turbine Runnermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine experimentally the dynamic response of hydraulic turbine runners in operation is challenging, especially in the case of Francis turbines and pump turbines, because the runner of those types of machines is rotating and confined in water, with small gaps and seals, and is strongly affected by boundary conditions [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The natural frequencies of this kind of hydraulic turbine runner are affected by the added mass of the surrounding water [ 10 , 11 ], the rotation [ 12 , 13 ] and the distances to the stationary parts [ 7 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e way of measuring frequency response found in the literature is with the use of accelerometers and strain gauges, and the excitation methods found is pressure field excitation, impact excitation, or excitation with various vibration mechanisms as electronic muscles and shakers. e surrounding structure of the runner has high impact on the natural frequencies and damping; hence, the analysis should preferably be carried out with the runner mounted in the housing [3,8]. Presas et al analyzed the frequency response of a pump turbine while mounted in the housing, but the use of two electronic muscles was not sufficient to excite all modes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inside the HYPERBOLE project (FP7-ENERGY-2013-1; Project number 608532) a large Francis unit has been investigated by means of numerical models [1,2] and experimentally on both the reduced scale model of this unit [3][4][5][6] and the real prototype [7].The real unit has a rated power of 444MW and it is located on the British Columbia in Canada. The tests on the reduced scale model (complete model with scale 1/16) were performed in the Laboratory of Hydraulic Machines (EPFL) in Switzerland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some operating points can be unstable, limiting the effective operating range of the unit. For this reason, it is of paramount importance to accurately predict (during the design phase of the unit) and to determine (during the operation of the installed unit) these particular points.Inside the HYPERBOLE project (FP7-ENERGY-2013-1; Project number 608532) a large Francis unit has been investigated by means of numerical models [1, 2] and experimentally on both the reduced scale model of this unit [3][4][5][6] and the real prototype [7].The real unit has a rated power of 444MW and it is located on the British Columbia in Canada. The tests on the reduced scale model (complete model with scale 1/16) were performed in the Laboratory of Hydraulic Machines (EPFL) in Switzerland.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%