2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3585781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the 1,2,4-linking hyperbranched poly(arylenevinylene) structure on organic light emitting diode performance as compared to conventional 1,3,5-linking one

Abstract: The influence of a novel 1,2,4-linking hyperbranched poly(arylenevinylene) (1,2,4-hb-PAV) material, designed to feature intramolecular energy-funneling, on the transport and emission properties of organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) has been studied. A comparison to conventional hyperbranched 1,3,5-linking polymers (1,3,5-hb-PAV), which do not exhibit this effect, has been made. For this purpose, single-layer organic light emitting diodes with a glass/indium–tin oxide/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(4-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, it is more straightforward to derive the inverse function x ( E 0 , E L , J b ), where the integration limits E 0 and E L are the values of the internal electric fields at both contacts: E 0 = E ( x = 0), E L = E ( x = L). Further details of these calculations are given elsewhere. , A second integration of the electric field using eq , provides the electrical response of the diode V b ( E 0 , E L , J b ). The determination of the unknown value E 0 is carried out numerically via the continuity equation for the current density across the device: J inj ( E 0 ) = J b where J inj is the injection current according to a certain injection formulation of the injection process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, it is more straightforward to derive the inverse function x ( E 0 , E L , J b ), where the integration limits E 0 and E L are the values of the internal electric fields at both contacts: E 0 = E ( x = 0), E L = E ( x = L). Further details of these calculations are given elsewhere. , A second integration of the electric field using eq , provides the electrical response of the diode V b ( E 0 , E L , J b ). The determination of the unknown value E 0 is carried out numerically via the continuity equation for the current density across the device: J inj ( E 0 ) = J b where J inj is the injection current according to a certain injection formulation of the injection process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a model must include structural characteristics of the device, such as layer thicknesses or active diode area, material parameters such as carrier mobility, μ, and characteristics of interfaces such as potential barriers for carrier injection from the electrodes. The model proposed resolves at the same time space-charge effects, together with injection mechanisms and nonvanishing electric fields at the contact interfaces, , so as to avoid making assumptions – as in previous models in the literature – about the conduction regime (injection-limited or bulk-limited) to extract parameters . To achieve this goal we have used a simple formulation based on the fundamental equations for the drift current (eq ), the 1D Poisson (eq ), and the integral expression of the applied external voltage (eq ) under single-carrier approach: J normalb = e μ ( E ) [ p n ] E ( x ) = e μ 0 .25em exp ( k E false( x false) ) [ p n ] E ( x ) normald E ( x ) normald x = e [ p ] ε ε 0 V b = prefix∫ normalo L E false( x false) d x …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a quasi-Newton algorithm to fit the experimental data, considering 0 and k as the only physical parameters in the classical expression of mobility. Details of the model can be seen elsewhere [14,15]. In view of the energetic level diagram for both materials [4], it is expected that conduction is mainly carried out by electrons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a model must include structural characteristics of the device, such as layer thicknesses or active diode area, material parameters such as carrier mobility, μ(E), and characteristics of interfaces such as potential barriers for carrier injection from the electrodes. The model proposed resolves at the same time space charge effects, together with injection mechanisms and non-vanishing electric fields at the contact interfaces [264,265], so as to avoid making assumptions -as in previous models in the literature-on the conduction regime (injection limited or bulk limited) in order to extract parameters [266]. So as to achieve this goal we have used a simple formulation based on the fundamental equations for the drift current (1), the one-dimensional Poisson equation (2 (2)…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Carrier Mobilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details of these calculations are given elsewhere [264,265]. A second integration of the electric field using (3), provides the electrical response of the diode V b (E 0 ,E L ,J b ).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Carrier Mobilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%