2015
DOI: 10.17221/13/2014-rae
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of temperature on vacuum drying characteristics, functional properties and micro structure of Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) gel

Abstract: Jha R.K., Prabhakar P.K., Srivastav P.P., Rao V.V. (2015): Influence of temperature on vacuum drying characteristics, functional properties and micro structure of Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) gel. Res. Agr. Eng., 61: 141-149.Aloe vera possesses therapeutic, antioxidant and some other functional properties. These properties may be affected by processing operations. The present study investigated the influence of operating temperature on vacuum drying characteristics, functional properties and the inner s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen in Figure 2 that the higher the temperature and the lower the thickness, the shorter the processing time is to reach the same moisture level. Similar behavior in the effect of temperature was observed during the drying of A. vera gel by other authors using hot air drying [ 10 , 29 ], vacuum drying [ 30 ], and osmotic dehydration [ 13 ]. Regarding the effect of thickness on drying time, similar behavior was observed during RW drying of mango slices [ 24 ], papaya puree [ 27 ], and kiwi slices [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen in Figure 2 that the higher the temperature and the lower the thickness, the shorter the processing time is to reach the same moisture level. Similar behavior in the effect of temperature was observed during the drying of A. vera gel by other authors using hot air drying [ 10 , 29 ], vacuum drying [ 30 ], and osmotic dehydration [ 13 ]. Regarding the effect of thickness on drying time, similar behavior was observed during RW drying of mango slices [ 24 ], papaya puree [ 27 ], and kiwi slices [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In contrast, the parameters n, a, and b did not present any behavior associated with temperature and/or sample thickness. Similar results were reported during the drying of A. vera [10,30] and tomato slices [41]. The Midilli-Kuck model successfully represents the drying kinetics in different foods, as reported by other authors during the drying of papaya by RW [27]; lemon slices by oven drying [43]; persimmon by osmo-convective drying [44]; banana slices by hot air drying [37].…”
Section: Drying Kinetic Modelssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, the Page model provides a better assessment for the banana flower drying process. Similarly, in previous studies, the Page model was considered as the best‐fitted model to describe the drying behavior of food products and medicinal plants such as star fruit slices (Hii & Ogugo, 2014), aloe vera ( Aloe barbadensis Miller ) gel (Jha et al., 2015), Loquat ( Eriobotrya japonica ) slices (Mishra & Sharma, 2019), thyme ( Thymus vulgaris ) leaves (Turan & Fıratlıgil, 2019), persimmon Slices (Senadeera et al., 2020). Parameters of thin‐layer drying models are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data modeling was done by using different mathematical models that describe moisture ratio with temperature, which sequentially relates moisture gradient in actual time with initial and equilibrium levels (Jha et al., 2015)Xnormalt=mtmnormalgmgwhere m t is the mass of the sliced banana flower sample at any time (g) and m g is the dried mass of the sliced banana flower sample (g).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values for the effective moisture diffusivity of the kerupuk ranged from 1.0413 × 10 -10 to 1.6363 × 10 -10 m 2 •s -1 for the garlic flavour, from 1.0007 × 10 -10 to 1.5619 × 10 -10 m 2 •s -1 for the chili flavour and ranged from 1.0000 × 10 -10 to 1.6228 × 10 -10 m 2 •s -1 for seaweed flavour. The values of D eff were in the range of 10 -12 to 10 -8 for the food materials (Mirzaee et al 2009;Jha et al 2015).…”
Section: Effective Diffusivitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%