2002
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of temperature and plant density on sensory quality and volatile terpenoids of carrot (Daucus carota L.) root

Abstract: Carrots were grown in controlled climate chambers at 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21°C and at two plant densities. Descriptive sensory analysis was performed and terpenes were assessed by means of a dynamic headspace technique. The highest score for sweet taste was obtained in carrots grown at the lowest temperature, while bitter taste, terpenes and sugars showed increasing values with increasing growth temperature. Plant density had little or no effect on sensory quality or terpenoid volatiles. Higher temperatures (18 a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
40
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A high correlation is found for the ''negatively" perceived attributes burning aftertaste, bitterness, terpene flavour and silage aroma, which are inversely correlated to the more ''positive" attributes as carrot and nutty flavour. These correlations are also found by Varming et al Table 3 Mean value for 16 carrot genotypes for 13 sensory attributes Genotypes (2004), Rosenfeld et al (2002) and Seljåsen, Hoftun, and Bengtsson (2000). Rosenfeld et al (2002) examined sensory quality of carrot roots and found the attributes sweet taste, crispness, juiciness and acidic taste to correlate inversely to terpene odour, green odour, terpene flavour, bitter taste, bitter aftertaste and others.…”
Section: Sensory Profilingsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A high correlation is found for the ''negatively" perceived attributes burning aftertaste, bitterness, terpene flavour and silage aroma, which are inversely correlated to the more ''positive" attributes as carrot and nutty flavour. These correlations are also found by Varming et al Table 3 Mean value for 16 carrot genotypes for 13 sensory attributes Genotypes (2004), Rosenfeld et al (2002) and Seljåsen, Hoftun, and Bengtsson (2000). Rosenfeld et al (2002) examined sensory quality of carrot roots and found the attributes sweet taste, crispness, juiciness and acidic taste to correlate inversely to terpene odour, green odour, terpene flavour, bitter taste, bitter aftertaste and others.…”
Section: Sensory Profilingsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These correlations are also found by Varming et al Table 3 Mean value for 16 carrot genotypes for 13 sensory attributes Genotypes (2004), Rosenfeld et al (2002) and Seljåsen, Hoftun, and Bengtsson (2000). Rosenfeld et al (2002) examined sensory quality of carrot roots and found the attributes sweet taste, crispness, juiciness and acidic taste to correlate inversely to terpene odour, green odour, terpene flavour, bitter taste, bitter aftertaste and others. Varming et al (2004) examined eating quality of raw carrots and found the attributes fruity taste, carrots aftertaste, nutty taste and sweet taste to correlate inversely to bitter taste, bitter aftertaste, earthy taste and earthy odour when carrying out a APLSR on the results.…”
Section: Sensory Profilingsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Along with sugars and other compounds responsible for the bitter off-taste of carrots such as polyacetylenes, isocoumarins and phenolic acids [2,3], volatile components have been reported to be the most influential parameters on consumer acceptance of carrots [4,5]. Varming et al [6] described the correlation between flavour compounds, sensory attributes (odour, taste and aftertaste) and consumer liking test (bitterness, sweetness and liking) when analysing the quality of six carrot cultivars grown at two different locations in Denmark; bitter taste being the sensory attribute correlated to the highest number of aroma variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%