2021
DOI: 10.1364/ao.426648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of temperature and dose rate on radiation-induced attenuation at 1542  nm in fluorine-doped fibers

Abstract: Radiation-induced attenuation (RIA) at 1542 nm of fluorine-doped fibers under gamma radiation source has been investigated for different dose rates and temperatures. Both the temperature and dose rate dependencies are unusual. First, the fiber presents an enhanced low dose rate sensitivity that is favored by increasing temperature. Furthermore, in certain conditions, RIA increases with irradiation temperature, which is a very rare phenomenon. We have built a phenomenological model that shows that these behavio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ELDRS in dielectrics was explained with simulations consisting of solving kinetic equations [29] or with analytical models [30]. It was previously observed in fibers with other doping elements (Er in [31], P in [32] and F in [33]), but we believe it is the first time that it is observed in Al-doped fibers. While this effect could be a flaw for dose measurement, it remains less than 20% in these ranges, which might be an acceptable error for some applications such as routine personal dose monitoring [34].…”
Section: Effect Of Dose Ratementioning
confidence: 90%
“…ELDRS in dielectrics was explained with simulations consisting of solving kinetic equations [29] or with analytical models [30]. It was previously observed in fibers with other doping elements (Er in [31], P in [32] and F in [33]), but we believe it is the first time that it is observed in Al-doped fibers. While this effect could be a flaw for dose measurement, it remains less than 20% in these ranges, which might be an acceptable error for some applications such as routine personal dose monitoring [34].…”
Section: Effect Of Dose Ratementioning
confidence: 90%