2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00165-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of taxonomic determination level on several community indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
41
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although high taxonomic resolution is desirable for biodiversity estimates, the ability to identify macroinvertebrate organisms from the Uberabinha river catchment to a lower taxonomic level than family would be very time consuming due to the required sampling effort. Furthermore, some studies have shown a strong correlation between species richness and richness based on both genus and family levels among macroinvertebrates (FURSE et al, 1984;HEWLETT, 2000;GUEROLD, 2000;MARSHALL et al, 2006). In a study about taxonomic resolution of freshwater macroinvertebrate samples from an Australian dryland catchment, Marshall et al (2006) showed that identification to family level is highly correlated to species level identification (>0.90%), suggesting that estimates of richness based on family resolution may adequately reflect species richness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although high taxonomic resolution is desirable for biodiversity estimates, the ability to identify macroinvertebrate organisms from the Uberabinha river catchment to a lower taxonomic level than family would be very time consuming due to the required sampling effort. Furthermore, some studies have shown a strong correlation between species richness and richness based on both genus and family levels among macroinvertebrates (FURSE et al, 1984;HEWLETT, 2000;GUEROLD, 2000;MARSHALL et al, 2006). In a study about taxonomic resolution of freshwater macroinvertebrate samples from an Australian dryland catchment, Marshall et al (2006) showed that identification to family level is highly correlated to species level identification (>0.90%), suggesting that estimates of richness based on family resolution may adequately reflect species richness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[57] used seven diversity indices to assess the effect of no-till farming on carabid communities and concluded that these diversity indices and models are not useful for the detection of the possible effects on carabids. [58] concluded that for differences in the values of diversity indices to be observed, the taxonomic level of identification must be deeper. However, identification to lower levels would hinder the use of diversity indices as quality indicators because sampling and identification would be more complex and costly, requiring the aid of specialists knowledgeable about the different taxonomic groups; such high-precision identification contrasts with the indicator characteristics proposed by [59].…”
Section: Indices Of Ecological Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesse contexto, Wright et al (1995) analisaram a utilização dos níveis de família e espécie em estudos ecoló-gicos e observaram o mesmo padrão de resposta utilizando ambos os níveis taxonômicos para avaliar o impacto de efluente de esgoto na comunidade macrobentônica, o que justificaria a identificação em nível de família, diminuindo tempo e custo das análises. Já Guerold (2000) observou que o uso do nível de família para o cálculo de algumas métricas é perigoso, especialmente ao medir a qualidade da água e as mudanças nas comunidades de macroinvertebrados. Para o autor, o uso de níveis taxonômicos maiores subestima o efeito das alterações ambientais.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified