1997
DOI: 10.1177/095765099721100401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of taper, Reynolds number and Mach number on the secondary flow field of a highly loaded turbine cascade

Abstract: The meridional divergence of low-pressure turbines has a strong influence on their secondary flow field. This paper describes experimental and numerical investigations on two highly loaded linear turbine cascades with the same blade profile and stacking but with parallel end walls and divergently tapered end walls respectively. The effects of taper, Reynolds number (1.2 × 10 5 , 5 × 10 5 ) and Mach number (0.30, 0.59, 0.80) are discussed. Data were obtained using pneumatic probes, pressure tappings and surface… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cascade with a rearloaded pressure distribution was observed to result in smaller secondary losses than the frontloaded cascade. As well, it is known from investigations regarding the influence of incidence (e. g. Hodson and Dominy, 1986) and from the authors previous studies concerning the effect of endwall taper (Duden and Fottner, 1997) that an increased loading, especially in the front part of the cascade, strongly increases the secondary flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The cascade with a rearloaded pressure distribution was observed to result in smaller secondary losses than the frontloaded cascade. As well, it is known from investigations regarding the influence of incidence (e. g. Hodson and Dominy, 1986) and from the authors previous studies concerning the effect of endwall taper (Duden and Fottner, 1997) that an increased loading, especially in the front part of the cascade, strongly increases the secondary flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Increasing the outlet Mach number results in smaller Zweifel coefficients, higher row velocity ratios and higher Reynolds numbers, as presented in more aft-loaded midspan loading distributions, as shown in Figure 7.11, and slightly smaller profile losses (Chapter 6). These results regarding the effects of Mach number on loading distributions are consistent with the findings by Camus et al (1984), Duden and Fottner (1997) and Dossena et al (1997). Figure 7.12, on the other hand, show evidence of suction side separation (S 5 ) on both airfoils.…”
Section: Midspan Blade Loading Distributionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similar trends appear in the near-wall region for SL1F, albeit less pronounced due to a weaker corner vortex. These results are consistent with the findings of Duden and Fottner (1997). Figure 7.17(b) shows significantly higher secondary kinetic energy production for the same downstream location for SL2F than for SL1F at all three Mach numbers.…”
Section: Pitchwise Mass-averagedsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations