2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2019.103292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of suspended sediment front on nutrients and phytoplankton dynamics off the Changjiang Estuary: A FVCOM-ERSEM coupled model experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The root-mean-square difference for nitrate was <20 μM for all years combined (Figure 5c) and 0.5 μM for phosphate (Figure 5d). More validation results could also be found at Ge et al (2020).…”
Section: Overall Quantification Of Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The root-mean-square difference for nitrate was <20 μM for all years combined (Figure 5c) and 0.5 μM for phosphate (Figure 5d). More validation results could also be found at Ge et al (2020).…”
Section: Overall Quantification Of Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This fraction could be up to ~80% when SPM ~ 1,000 mg/L (Middelburg & Herman, ). The background SPM of river mouth is ~400 mg/L (Ge et al, ; Ge, Shen, et al, ), suggesting that the nutrient‐absorbed nutrients could be a significant fraction (Xu et al, ). Additionally, the sediment‐induced nutrient absorption/desorption is a rapid process (Fitzsimons et al, ).…”
Section: Variability In Physical Processes and Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of SPM on the phytoplankton dynamics and bloom events, probably due to sunlight sheltering, has been emphasized by Ge, Torres, et al. (2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The above comparisons suggest that the higher SPM contents in July 2016, which were probably the result of the flood event occurring in the river basin, might be the best explanation for depressed nutrient variation rates in seawater. The effect of SPM on the phytoplankton dynamics and bloom events, probably due to sunlight sheltering, has been emphasized by Ge, Torres, et al (2020).…”
Section: Comparison Among Cruisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fraction could be up to ~80% when SPM ~1,000 mg/L (Middelburg & Herman, 2007). The background SPM of river mouth is ~400 mg/L (Ge et al, 2020;Ge, Shen, et al, 2015), suggesting that the nutrient-absorbed nutrients could be a significant fraction (Xu et al, 2013). Additionally, the sediment-10.1029/2019JC015595…”
Section: Effect Of Sediment On Nutrients and Chl A Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%