2014
DOI: 10.1515/jag-2014-0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface reflectivity on reflectorless electronic distance measurement and terrestrial laser scanning

Abstract: Abstract:The uncertainty of electronic distance measurement to surfaces rather than to dedicated precisionre ectors (re ectorless EDM) is a ected by the entire system comprising instrument, atmosphere and surface. The impact of the latter is signi cant for applications like geodetic monitoring, high-precision surface modelling or laser scanner self-calibration. Nevertheless, it has not yet received su cient attention and is not well understood. We have carried out an experimental investigation of the impact of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With proper reference data, these profiles could be therefore used to identify the target material. The differences between materials for specific spectral bands agree with the error magnitudes identified in previous investigations on material-dependent uncertainties in reflectorless EDM (Zámečníková et al, 2014), signaling also that this approach holds potential to mitigate material-related uncertainties by accessing multispectral distance information unattainable for standard instruments. We have not yet investigated which are the dominant physical phenomena causing the observed distance dependencies with wavelength and material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…With proper reference data, these profiles could be therefore used to identify the target material. The differences between materials for specific spectral bands agree with the error magnitudes identified in previous investigations on material-dependent uncertainties in reflectorless EDM (Zámečníková et al, 2014), signaling also that this approach holds potential to mitigate material-related uncertainties by accessing multispectral distance information unattainable for standard instruments. We have not yet investigated which are the dominant physical phenomena causing the observed distance dependencies with wavelength and material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Since the target center is estimated from this point cloud, it can be assumed that the geometry also has an influence on the precision of the TCE. Zámečníková et al [19] show that systematic errors in the single point measurement can also occur due to the incidence angle. 3.…”
Section: Influencing Factors On the Precision Of Target Center Estimamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithms are assumed to be unbiased, thus no systematics are expected. Only the systematic errors due to the incidence angle [19] remain. However, since the incidence angles during the scanning of targets are usually small and the error on the TCE will behave the same as for the single point measurement, this systematic error will not be examined further.…”
Section: Influencing Factors On the Precision Of Target Center Estimamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The further the points are away, the lower is the intensity by the inverse-square-law and therefore the likelihood for invalid points will increase. For the second argument the signal strength is not only relative to the material and the distance, but also to the angle of incidence (Zámečníková et al, 2014). When holes are developing, vertical edges become visible due to the displacement of covering material at the breakline.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%