1986
DOI: 10.1021/j100408a052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface phase transitions on desorption kinetics: the compensation effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior can be viewed as an example of the well-known "compensation effect" in chemical kinetics in which the activation energy and prefactor of a reaction both change relatively abruptly in the same direction (i.e., compensate), whereas the overall reaction rate changes smoothly. In the case of desorption from a surface, this behavior has sometimes been traced to a phase transition in the substrate or adsorbate layer (15). The magnitudes of the changes in the current example, however, dwarf those of any prior report of a compensation effect of which we are aware.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This behavior can be viewed as an example of the well-known "compensation effect" in chemical kinetics in which the activation energy and prefactor of a reaction both change relatively abruptly in the same direction (i.e., compensate), whereas the overall reaction rate changes smoothly. In the case of desorption from a surface, this behavior has sometimes been traced to a phase transition in the substrate or adsorbate layer (15). The magnitudes of the changes in the current example, however, dwarf those of any prior report of a compensation effect of which we are aware.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The observed change in slope of the Arrhenius plot is quite abrupt. A firstorder phase transition will produce an inflection point, i.e., a discontinuity in slope (15). Although a finite-sized protein cannot exhibit a true first-order transition, the sharpness of the changeover between the two temperature regimes adds further support to the supposition that a global transformation such as melting or partial melting underlies the observations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Alternatively speaking, it is the strongly enhanced entropy of the mobile surface species which leads to an according quenching of the desorption rate. 46 A similar behavior has been observed for CO on Ru(0001) which likewise displays island growth and coexistence with a 2D-gas phase in the coverage range CO < 0.33 ML at elevated T. 47,48 Figure 7 shows a series of TPD spectra with 1.8-3.1 layers of NTCDA deposited onto Ag(111) at 77 K. For initial coverages in excess of 2 ML the peak at 350 K, attributed to desorption of the bilayer gradually disappears and is replaced by a peak at 375 K which does not saturate and therefore represents NTCDA multilayer desorption. As the multilayers desorb at 25 K higher temperature than the bilayer, the latter represents a metastable phase, which vanishes as soon as nuclei of the multilayer are formed.…”
Section: Thermal Desorption Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 and 15 clarify the observed shift of the TPD spectra to low temperatures as coverage increases; it is due to the strong decrease in the activation energy for desorption with coverage. This could have been even more dramatic except that here we have a clear case of the so called compensation effect in desorption 26 : both the activation energy for desorption and the preexponent factor display similar behavior with coverage. The result is a much slower change of the overall rate of desorption with increasing coverage.…”
Section: Equilibrium Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 84%