2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface forces and wall effects on the minimum fluidization velocity of liquid-solid micro-fluidized beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calibration was performed with and without particles to determine the flowrate at which liquid moves through the system. The minimum fluidisation velocity was determined in our previous study using micro-fluidised bed by observing visually the bed height expansion and also by extrapolation of a linear relationship between the superficial liquid velocity and ratio of bed expansion (do Nascimento, et al 2016). The theoretical minimum fluidization velocities, Umf,theory was calculated using the Ergun equation (Ergun 1952) with an estimated initial packed bed voidage of εmf = 0.40 ± 0.01 in line with previous experiments (Tang, et al 2015) and trend of rectangular packed bed voidage with particle-to-bed ratios (Navvab Kashani, et al 2016).…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calibration was performed with and without particles to determine the flowrate at which liquid moves through the system. The minimum fluidisation velocity was determined in our previous study using micro-fluidised bed by observing visually the bed height expansion and also by extrapolation of a linear relationship between the superficial liquid velocity and ratio of bed expansion (do Nascimento, et al 2016). The theoretical minimum fluidization velocities, Umf,theory was calculated using the Ergun equation (Ergun 1952) with an estimated initial packed bed voidage of εmf = 0.40 ± 0.01 in line with previous experiments (Tang, et al 2015) and trend of rectangular packed bed voidage with particle-to-bed ratios (Navvab Kashani, et al 2016).…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade lots of attention have been paid to fluidised beds at the micro-scale due to their excellent operation abilities and fast screening for various applications (Liu, et al 2008, Tang, et al 2015, Xu and Yue 2009. Micro-fluidised beds refers to a fluidised bed with the bed cross-section or inner diameter at micrometre or millimetre scale (do Nascimento, et al 2016, Potic, et al 2005, Zivkovic and Biggs 2015, Zivkovic, et al 2013. In terms of applications, the micro-fluidized bed holds promise in the micro-process and microfluidic context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes particle aggregation and adhesion to the bed wall a potential issue, even to the point of preventing fluidization [28,29]. The acid-base model of van Oss, Chaudhury and Good combined with the Derjaguin approximation can be used to predict wall material/particle/fluid triplets that avoid this issue [29,38,39]. In the case of the wall material/particle pair considered here, we have both predicted and demonstrated [29] that ethanol is a suitable fluidizing medium, hence why it has been used in the work reported here.…”
Section: Fluidizing Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its initial introduction by Potic et al [33], only a small number of studies have been reported on liquid fluidization in µFB. Whilst some of these studies have been application-focused [34,35], the vast majority have focused on hydrodynamic aspects of µFBs [28,31,36,37] and the effects of surface forces and wall effects on their fluidization behaviour [28,29,38,39]. Of these, only Doroodchi et al [31] have focused in detail on mixing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rice husk had a lot of burrs, which led to the non-ignorable role of surface force compared with the gravity and inertia force in a small-scale fluidized bed. Simultaneously, the lower sphericity of rice husk also contributed to the increase in the Umf (Fotovat et al 2015;do Nascimento et al 2016). Moreover, increasing the M of biomass results in increased particle density and adhesive force, which led to the Umf increasing and the Pd decreasing considerably.…”
Section: Effect Of Moisture Content On Biomass Fluidization Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%