2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface finish and composition on the deterioration of building stones exposed to acid atmospheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase in the b* value due to acid attack on limestone was also described by Grossi et al (2007), although according to these authors its implications on the esthetics of the rock were almost unnoticeable. Vázquez et al (2016) reported very similar behavior to that observed in this study, finding that the total color difference (ΔE*) was also unappreciable. For their part, Urosevic et al (2010) and Benavente et al (2003) observed that the polished finish underwent more changes than the rough finish (the H finish in this study), showing an increase in lightness and a fall in the chromatic parameters.…”
Section: Measuring the Differences In The Chromatic And Roughness Parameterssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This increase in the b* value due to acid attack on limestone was also described by Grossi et al (2007), although according to these authors its implications on the esthetics of the rock were almost unnoticeable. Vázquez et al (2016) reported very similar behavior to that observed in this study, finding that the total color difference (ΔE*) was also unappreciable. For their part, Urosevic et al (2010) and Benavente et al (2003) observed that the polished finish underwent more changes than the rough finish (the H finish in this study), showing an increase in lightness and a fall in the chromatic parameters.…”
Section: Measuring the Differences In The Chromatic And Roughness Parameterssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The acidified solution in each tank was a mixture of tap water, HNO3 and H2SO4. Similar acid solution (H2SO4+HNO3+H2O) and (H2SO3+HNO3+H2O) were also used in [15] and [17], respectively while [18] and [23] adopted a sulphuric acid solution (H2SO4+ H2O) and a nitric acid solution (HNO3+H2O), respectively in their studies. It was further reported in [17] that the HNO3 present in the acid solution acted as a catalyser of the H2SO3 reaction, while the presence of H2SO4 caused more damage [18].…”
Section: Test Specimens and Accelerated Wetting-drying Cycles (Wdc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar acid solution (H2SO4+HNO3+H2O) and (H2SO3+HNO3+H2O) were also used in [15] and [17], respectively while [18] and [23] adopted a sulphuric acid solution (H2SO4+ H2O) and a nitric acid solution (HNO3+H2O), respectively in their studies. It was further reported in [17] that the HNO3 present in the acid solution acted as a catalyser of the H2SO3 reaction, while the presence of H2SO4 caused more damage [18]. The acidified solution used in each tank was a mixture of 40.5 mL of 1.0M, HNO3, 27 mL of 1.0 M, H2SO4 and 27 L of H2O (tap water).…”
Section: Test Specimens and Accelerated Wetting-drying Cycles (Wdc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the stress strength factor and the stress strength coefficient of quartz materials are influenced by deionized water, HCl, NaOH, and other acids and bases [3]. e chemical atmospheres may cause damage to all types of stones, especially calcite stones, and the effect of acid atmospheres is related with porosity [4]. In the chemical environment, the mineral components in rocks tend to react with solutions, via complex processes and mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%