“…Electrostatic and noncovalent interactions of the dye with the polar surface and adjacent dye molecules may lead to the formation of an ordered assembly of dye aggregates on titania. − Dye aggregation is known be the Achille’s heel of most of organic sensitizers, usually leading to intermolecular excited state quenching and, hence, reducing the DSCs photocurrent and overall power output. ,, The formation of stable aggregates on the TiO 2 surface is usually manifested by a considerable broadening and blue or red shift, depending on whether H- , or J-type of aggregates are formed, of the UV–vis absorption spectrum upon TiO 2 adsorption compared to that for of dyes in solution. , In some selected cases, a controlled aggregation has proven to enhance the photocurrent generation due to the larger light-absorption window of the aggregates, possibly combined to an efficient charge transfer from the aggregate excited state to the semiconductor. ,,, The use of antiaggregation coadsorbents, − among which the most widely employed is chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), − has been reported to effectively suppress dye aggregation on the TiO 2 surface, yielding to notably improved cell performances for dye being critically affected by aggregation. Because CDCA competes with the dye for TiO 2 absorption, thus, breaking undesired dye/dye intermolecular interactions, a general decrease of the dye loading is also typically observed with a consequent decrease of the light harvesting efficiency of the photoelectrode, which is however usually offset by an improved charge generation efficiency due to suppression of intermolecular excited state quenching and filtering effects.…”