2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2016.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of sulfiding agent and pressure on structure and performance of CoMo/Al2O3 hydrodesulfurization catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
8
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition of oxide to sulfide was followed in-situ with XANES and EXAFS (see Figure 9 and Figure 10). Similarly to what has been obtained in literature [89][90][91][92], the oxide precursor underwent transformation into intermediate oxy-sulfide species prior to conversion into the final sulfide form.…”
Section: 2 Oxide To Sulfide Conversion During Sulfidationsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The transition of oxide to sulfide was followed in-situ with XANES and EXAFS (see Figure 9 and Figure 10). Similarly to what has been obtained in literature [89][90][91][92], the oxide precursor underwent transformation into intermediate oxy-sulfide species prior to conversion into the final sulfide form.…”
Section: 2 Oxide To Sulfide Conversion During Sulfidationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This may be explained by an interaction with the support resulting in the formation of highly dispersed, small particles as indicated by Raman. [56,90], but the CN = 0.26-0.43 is too low to obtain a precise estimate of the particle size (e.g. due to high temperature leading to a high Debye-Waller factor and small particle size due to mobility at > 300 °C), which is expected to be < 2 nm [93].…”
Section: Sulfide Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They delay the sulfidation of the promoter with respect to the formation of MoS 2 and as a result, favour the insertion of Co or Ni in the edges of MoS 2 slabs ,. Yet, recent data indicate that this explanation may be too simplistic since it was shown that retarding the sulfidation of the promoter to temperatures where MoS 2 is already formed, is apparently not a sufficient condition for the formation of mixed sites . Moreover starting from organometallic or alkoxide compounds, a significant increase in the intrinsic activity has been observed, presumably because it modified the distribution of the promoter on the edges as compared to the classical method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the activation temperature, reaction time, pressure, and the support used, different mixtures of MoO 3 and MoS 2 are formed within the catalytic materials. 17,18 The inuence of the suldation process on the HDO of aromatics is very important for this type of catalysts. 19 The NiMo sulded catalysts supported on Al 2 O 3 have been tested in the HDO of triacylglycerides and were the best option among different supports to achieve complete deoxygenation mixture of hydrocarbons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%