2010
DOI: 10.1080/00103621003721403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Sugarcane Cropping on the Quality of an Oxisol and an Inceptisol in Mauritius

Abstract: Productive capacity of Mauritius soils could be declining with sugarcane monoculture. Effects of short-and long-term sugarcane cropping on quality of an Oxisol and an Inceptisol were assessed to a depth of 50 cm. In the short term (<25 years), cropping led to less organic matter and topsoil microbial biomass (0 to 15 cm), probably through increased microbial breakdown of organic matter (OM) and downward movement by tillage. The pH of both soils and the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the Oxisol increased fol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aggregate class > 2.00 mm in CTc4 and CTc8 showed a lower stability in the 0.00-0.05 m layer when compared to CT and, consequently, the aggregate class < 2.00 mm in CTc4 was inversely proportional when compared to the class > 2.00 m in the same layer (Table 2). Cheong et al (2010) observed that soil management carried out by using agricultural machinery and implements and the absence of cover crop cultivation provided a lower percentage of aggregates larger than 2 mm and WMD in the 0.05-0.10 m layer. According to Martins et al (2010), the absence of soil cover exposes aggregates to external disrupting forces such as rainfall and agricultural management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aggregate class > 2.00 mm in CTc4 and CTc8 showed a lower stability in the 0.00-0.05 m layer when compared to CT and, consequently, the aggregate class < 2.00 mm in CTc4 was inversely proportional when compared to the class > 2.00 m in the same layer (Table 2). Cheong et al (2010) observed that soil management carried out by using agricultural machinery and implements and the absence of cover crop cultivation provided a lower percentage of aggregates larger than 2 mm and WMD in the 0.05-0.10 m layer. According to Martins et al (2010), the absence of soil cover exposes aggregates to external disrupting forces such as rainfall and agricultural management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In general, compaction process promotes an increased soil density and soil penetration resistance, reducing macroporosity, aeration, and infiltration and storage of water in the soil (Lipiec et al, 2012;Cortez et al, 2014;Deperon Júnior et al, 2016). However, the way and intensity of this process depend on soil type, management, and climate, reflecting mainly on soil water content (Cheong et al, 2010) since there are moisture bands that make the soil more or less susceptible to compaction (Michelon et al, 2009).…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%