2010
DOI: 10.1149/1.3425607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Substrate Dislocation on Passivation of Pure Iron in pH 8.4 Borate Buffer Solution

Abstract: The influence of substrate dislocations on the passivation behavior of pure iron in a pH 8.4 borate buffer solution was investigated. Cold-rolling was employed to induce dislocation in the annealed substrate. The dislocation density on the cold-rolled substrate depended on the reduction ratio ͑Red͒ and was maximum at Red = 60%. The electric charge consumed in the passivation and the passivity-maintaining current increased with an increase in the dislocation density. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy revea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the reaction, 1 mol of point defects in the duplex stainless steel induce x/2 mol of oxygen vacancies in the passive film [28]. Therefore, More dislocations induce more oxygen vacancies in the passive film and decrease its compactness and corrosion resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the reaction, 1 mol of point defects in the duplex stainless steel induce x/2 mol of oxygen vacancies in the passive film [28]. Therefore, More dislocations induce more oxygen vacancies in the passive film and decrease its compactness and corrosion resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the oxide film, the deformation increases the doped charge density (concentration of donors and acceptors) in the passive films of stainless steels [18][19][20]41]. For pure iron, dislocations exposed to the iron surface increase the number of donors, resulting in a highly defective passive film [42]. In this particular study, after tensile straining and repassivation, SKP showed that the surface of the AISI 304 steel did not return to the initial level of passivity and that the potential was 30 mV lower than that of the unstrained reference area (Figure 14…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] However, corrosion resistance of carbon steels subjected to SPD has been a debatable issue. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Reduction in grain size, increase in the extent of dislocations, microstrain and surface roughness, change in texture and change in residual stress were considered as the major factors that have influenced the corrosion resistance of steels after SPD. The corrosivity of the medium, solubility of corrosion products and the ability of the corrosive medium to promote passivation, further increase the complexity by another dimension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%