1980
DOI: 10.1021/ja00531a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of substituents at the 5 position on the structure of uridine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This enhancement corresponds to about a 0.4 kcal/mol free energy difference (according to the Boltzmann distribution), which does cause an excess of north pucker in monomer simulations. However, this discrepancy does not occur for unmodified uridine, which uses NA36 parameters, while most modified uridines, especially in the anticodon, are known to stabilize the north ( C3'endo ) conformation . The one exception, dihydrouridine (discussed below), does not use this set of χ parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enhancement corresponds to about a 0.4 kcal/mol free energy difference (according to the Boltzmann distribution), which does cause an excess of north pucker in monomer simulations. However, this discrepancy does not occur for unmodified uridine, which uses NA36 parameters, while most modified uridines, especially in the anticodon, are known to stabilize the north ( C3'endo ) conformation . The one exception, dihydrouridine (discussed below), does not use this set of χ parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…76% of the S-conformers; the conformation of the bromo and iodo derivatives 1b,c are shifted towards N (72 and 73% S). These data demonstrate that the higher the electron-withdrawing effect of the 7-substituent is, the more the N > S equilibrium of the sugar moiety is biased towards the N-conformation [23] [24]. Table 3 compares the data with a series of other 7-halogenated 7-deazapurine nucleosides 1a ± c related to dA, dG, and dI [6 ± 9] [25] [26], i.e., 6a ± c, 7a ± c, and 8a ± c, which show the same phenomenon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…5). In contrast, small molecule crystal structures showing how the N-C bonds in substituted uridines respond to electron withdrawal in the uracil show no departure from trigonal planar geometry at N1 (43). Therefore, UDG funnels macromolecular DNA substrate-binding energy into catalytic power by conformationally closing to enforce substrate distortions, which would be energetically difficult in small molecule systems that lack large interfaces and transitions between two distinct rigid conformational states.…”
Section: Structural Implications For Two Coupled Stereoelectronic Effmentioning
confidence: 96%