Influence of study approaches and course design on academic success in the undergraduate anatomy laboratory

Abstract

Many pre-health professional programs require completion of an undergraduate anatomy course with a laboratory component, yet grades in these courses are often low. Many students perceive anatomy as a more challenging subject than other coursework, and the resulting anxiety surrounding this perception may be a significant contributor to poor performance. Well-planned and deliberate guidance from instructors, as well as thoughtful course design, may be necessary to assist students in finding the best approach to studying for anatomy. This article assesses which study habits are associated with course success and whether course design influences study habits. Surveys (n = 1,274) were administered to students enrolled in three undergraduate human anatomy laboratory courses with varying levels of cooperative learning and structured guidance. The surveys collected information on potential predictors of performance, including student demographics, educational background, self-assessment ability, and study methods (e.g., flashcards, textbooks, diagrams). Compared to low performers, high performers perceive studying in laboratory, asking the instructor questions, quizzing alone, and quizzing others as more effective for learning. Additionally, students co-enrolled in a flipped, active lecture anatomy course achieve higher grades and find active learning activities (e.g., quizzing alone and in groups) more helpful for their learning in the laboratory. These results strengthen previous research suggesting that student performance is more greatly enhanced by an active classroom environment that practices successful study strategies rather than one that simply encourages students to employ such strategies inside and outside the classroom. Anat Sci Educ 11: 496-509. © 2018 American Association of Anatomists.

Comparison of Team‐Based Learning versus Traditional Lectures in Neuroanatomy: Medical Student Knowledge and Satisfaction

“…The study of anatomy can be difficult and exhausting mainly due to its wide content and extensive nomenclature. Professors should be encouraged to use new pedagogical strategies that make content more accessible, interactive, and attractive to students (Bucarey and Álvarez, 2006;Pereira et al, 2007;Appaji et al, 2010;Lochner et al, 2016;Eleazer and Scopa Kelso, 2018). In several contexts, active learning methodologies have been suggested (Chi, 2009;Haak et al, 2011;Bate et al, 2014;Mi and Gould, 2014;Day, 2018).…”

Multifaceted remediation program: experience of a residency program to rescue residents who failed the American Board of Anesthesiology basic examination

“…There is strong correlation between the approach to learning that a student adopts and academic performance. 22 Results from academic literature converge on the idea that the teacher must be proactive to facilitate critical thinking and deep learning in students at different levels of education. 22 We used a generic framework of student approach to learning based on constructivism and systems theory to identify motive and congruent strategy as determinants of learning approach.…”

“… 22 Results from academic literature converge on the idea that the teacher must be proactive to facilitate critical thinking and deep learning in students at different levels of education. 22 We used a generic framework of student approach to learning based on constructivism and systems theory to identify motive and congruent strategy as determinants of learning approach. 23 , 24 The combination of right motive and strategy yields the approach to learning.…”

A Pilot Study of a Physical Therapy Cadaveric Anatomy Course: Assessing the Impact of Examination Format on the Learning Environment

“…In anatomical education, medical students often perceive the LE as heavily fact‐based, with a substantial workload reliant on surface‐level approaches of rote memorization (Pandey and Zimitat, 2007). Yet, numerous studies have shown that students who implement deep learning approaches in anatomy are more successful on examinations (Pandey and Zimitat, 2007; Smith and Mathias, 2010; Ward, 2011; Eleazer and Scopa Kelso, 2018). As a result, best practices in anatomical education inspire deep‐level learning approaches and support the use of alternative methods of teaching human anatomy, including prosections, computer‐assisted instruction/learning, simulations, and models (Estai and Bunt, 2016; Losco et al, 2017).…”