2014
DOI: 10.5194/tc-8-1825-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of stress, temperature and crystal morphology on isothermal densification and specific surface area decrease of new snow

Abstract: Abstract. Laboratory-based, experimental data for the microstructural evolution of new snow are scarce, though applications would benefit from a quantitative characterization of the main influences. To this end, we have analyzed the metamorphism and concurrent densification of new snow under isothermal conditions by means of X-ray microtomography and compiled a comprehensive data set of 45 time series. In contrast to previous measurements on isothermal metamorphism on time scales of weeks to months, we analyze… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SSA decay is also consistent with current understanding and parameterizations of SSA evolution (e.g. Carmagnola et al, 2014;Flanner and Zender, 2006;Schleef et al, 2014).…”
Section: Vertical Representativeness Of Optimal Impurity Contentsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The SSA decay is also consistent with current understanding and parameterizations of SSA evolution (e.g. Carmagnola et al, 2014;Flanner and Zender, 2006;Schleef et al, 2014).…”
Section: Vertical Representativeness Of Optimal Impurity Contentsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…2.2) and the constants a η = 0.1 K −1 , b η = 0.023 m 3 kg −1 , and T η = 5 K. The viscosity dependence on snow temperature is limited according to Schleef et al (2014) who pointed out that the impact of snow temperature on snow densification becomes negligible at low temperatures. The last dimensionless function, f W , describes the decrease of viscosity in the presence of liquid water.…”
Section: Snow Compactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the compaction velocity actually has a high dependence to snow microstructure (Lehning et al, 2002). This complex dependence cannot be described in Crocus by the visco-elastic concept and microstructure-dependent models of compaction are only available for very specific conditions (Schleef et al, 2014). These limitations partly explain the errors of simulated HN identified 15 by Champavier et al (2018) in combination with the known errors and underdispersion of precipitation input.…”
Section: Crocus Snowpack Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%