Influence of straight versus angulated screw channel titanium bases on failure loads of two‐piece ceramic and titanium implants restored with screw‐retained monolithic crowns: An in‐vitro study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo analyze the influence of titanium‐base (straight [SSC]/angulated‐screw‐channel [ASC]) on failure‐loads and bending‐moments of two‐piece ceramic and titanium–zirconium implants restored with monolithic‐zirconia crowns after fatigue.Materials and MethodsThirty‐two anterior monolithic‐screw‐retained zirconia crowns were divided into four groups (n = 8/group) according to the factors: (1) type of implant material: two‐piece titanium–zirconium implant (Ti–Zr; control‐group) versus two‐piece ceramic implant (CI; test‐group) and (2) type of titanium‐base: SSC (0° angle) versus ASC (25°). An intact implant was used for field emission gun‐scanning electronic microscopy (FEG‐SEM) characterization and Raman spectroscopy for phase analyses and residual stress quantification. All samples were exposed to fatigue with thermodynamic loading (1.2‐million‐cycles, 49 N, 1.6 Hz, 5–55°C) at a 30° angle. Surviving specimens were loaded until failure (SLF) and bending moments were recorded. Failed samples were examined using light microscope and SEM. Statistical analyses included ANOVA and Mann–Whitney U‐test.ResultsRaman‐spectroscopy revealed the presence of residual compressive stresses. FEG‐SEM revealed a roughened surface between threads and polished surface at the cervical‐collar of the ceramic implant. All samples survived fatigue and were free of complications. Mean bending‐moments (±SD) were: Ti‐Zr‐0: 241 ± 45 N cm, Ti‐Zr‐25: 303 ± 86 N cm, CI‐0: 326 ± 58 N cm, CI‐25: 434 ± 71 N cm. Titanium‐base and implant‐material had significant effects in favor of ASC titanium bases (p = .001) and ceramic‐implants (p < .001). Failure analysis after SLF revealed severe fractures in ceramic implants, whereas titanium implants were restricted to plastic deformation.ConclusionsCeramic and titanium implants exhibited high reliability after fatigue, with no failures. From a mechanical perspective, titanium bases with ASC can be recommended for both ceramic and titanium implants and are safe for clinical application.