“…It has been advocated that the detected INR measurement remains unchanged if analyzed within 24 h (Adcock, Kressin & Marlar, 1998; McGlasson, 1999; Davis et al , 1998; Awad, Selim & Al‐Sabbagh, 2004; Rao et al , 2000; Froom et al , 2001; Brigden et al , 1997), whereas other studies have showed time‐dependent derangements of the measured INR (Kitchen et al , 2007; Van Geest‐Daalderop et al , 2005; Leeming et al , 1998). The published studies (Van Geest‐Daalderop et al , 2005; Davis et al , 1998; Awad, Selim and Al‐Sabbagh, 2004; Leeming et al , 1998; Adcock, Kressin and Marlar, 1998;McGlasson, 1999; Rao et al , 2000; Froom et al , 2001; Baglin & Luddington, 1997) suffer from various methodological shortcomings; e.g., small sample size (Rao et al , 2000; Froom et al , 2001) and simplified and insufficient statistical analyses (Baglin and Luddington, 1997; Froom et al , 2001; McGlasson, 1999) resulting in nonconclusive results (Bland & Altman, 2007). Noteworthy, the studies reporting on no alteration of the INR following a 24‐h storage of blood samples mainly focus on the effect on the overall mean INR, and thereby potentially missing changes in individual patients (Kitchen et al , 2007; Van Geest‐Daalderop et al , 2005).…”