2015
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of storage conditions and extraction methods on the quantity and quality of circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA): the SPIDIA-DNAplas External Quality Assessment experience

Abstract: The evidence-based results of the SPIDIA-DNAplas EQA have been proposed as a basis for the development of a Technical Specification by the European Committee for standardisation (CEN).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For diagnostic purposes, cfDNA must be extracted with kits or methods dedicated for cfDNA as use of generic DNA extraction methods will lead to a loss or further fragmentation of short cfDNA fragments . Extraction methods for cfDNA differ in several aspects (Figure ).…”
Section: Cfdna Extraction From Blood and Other Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For diagnostic purposes, cfDNA must be extracted with kits or methods dedicated for cfDNA as use of generic DNA extraction methods will lead to a loss or further fragmentation of short cfDNA fragments . Extraction methods for cfDNA differ in several aspects (Figure ).…”
Section: Cfdna Extraction From Blood and Other Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aspects include a number of pre-analytical parameters that can affect the concentration and fragmentation of cfDNA as recently discussed [24][25][26][27][28]. It seems that a reasonable level of consensus exists regarding the optimal source for cfDNA measurement as most studies suggest that quantification is more reliable when determined from plasma than from serum [24,25].…”
Section: Metastatic Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of direct comparison between studies and the numerous different quantification approaches renders progress in terms of clinical relevance difficult. Among others, the different nontumor-specific reference genes comprise cyclophilin, B2M, and albumin [26][27][28][31][32][33]; and other strategies include methylation assays or quantification of tumor-relevant genetic alterations [34]. Provided that all the above-mentioned steps are carefully considered, a reliable quantitative measure of total cfDNA is achievable and samples can be further analyzed to detect tumor-specific mutations and quantify the mutated alleles in the sample.…”
Section: Metastatic Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our samples did not involve a cfDNA extraction process. Isolation of cfDNA from small amounts of plasma remains one of the greatest technical challenges that we still face with regard to ctDNA genotyping (36,37 ). However, it is nearly impossible for plasma to be used as a quality control material for ctDNA somatic mutation testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%