2018
DOI: 10.1177/1077546318813403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of static preload on vibration reduction effect of floating slab tracks

Abstract: To effectively reduce the railway vibration and its environmental impact, vibration mitigation measures are increasingly used. The vibration reduction effect of railway tracks is described quantitatively by insertion loss (IL). ILs obtained from in situ measurements under moving train loads and laboratory tests under artificial excitation differ significantly due to the different track loading state between these two methods. The differences of track loading state are induced by the moving effect of train pass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In which the spring damping element Combin14 is used to simulate the elastic connection of fastener between rail and slab, as well as the supporting between slab and subgrade, the beam188 element was used to simulate rail, track slab, short sleeper are simulated by element Solid185. 15,16…”
Section: Modeling Of Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In which the spring damping element Combin14 is used to simulate the elastic connection of fastener between rail and slab, as well as the supporting between slab and subgrade, the beam188 element was used to simulate rail, track slab, short sleeper are simulated by element Solid185. 15,16…”
Section: Modeling Of Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant results show that the inclusion of the rail pad nonlinearity into the modelling results in up to 6 dB differences in the peak over a frequency range of 0–200 Hz compared to a linear model [ 16 ]. Ma et al also found that the mitigation effectiveness of the FST is influenced by the preload–track interaction behavior in an experimental test [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al established a simplified FE-IFE coupled model and studied the influence of static preload on the vibration reduction effect of SSFST in the laboratory test. 14 Yang et al studied the dynamic response differences of the soil-tunnel system under moving train loads based on 2D and 2.5D FEM-IFEM. 15 In the aforementioned numerical methods, in order to reduce the calculation time, the simulation of the train is mostly simplified into a single-carriage or moving loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%