The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of spatial frequency and emotion expression on face processing in patients with panic disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within-group analysis revealed a higher Р100 amplitude for angry facial expressions compared to other expressions in the PA subjects. This result is not entirely consistent with some previous fi ndings where an enhanced response to fearful facial stimuli served as a marker of panic disorder [7]. The increased focus on angry facial expressions in the PA individuals may be due to being in the early stages of panic disorder or having high trait anxiety scores [8].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Within-group analysis revealed a higher Р100 amplitude for angry facial expressions compared to other expressions in the PA subjects. This result is not entirely consistent with some previous fi ndings where an enhanced response to fearful facial stimuli served as a marker of panic disorder [7]. The increased focus on angry facial expressions in the PA individuals may be due to being in the early stages of panic disorder or having high trait anxiety scores [8].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Minimum and maximum peaks (and latencies) were extracted for the following ERP components: P100 (50–150 ms; P7 and P8), N170 (120–220 ms; P7 and P8) and P300 (300–450 ms; F3, FZ and F4). These time ranges and channel selections (as well as reference and ground electrode choices) were based on prior usage (Izurieta Hidalgo et al ., ; Shim et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%